Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Dec;43(12):765–770. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000530

Table 1.

Individual-level factor descriptive statistics and associations with condom use versus non-use during anal sex events

Participants Anal Sex Events
(ASE)
Condom-protected
ASE
Univariate
Associations
Multivariate
Associations*
n % n % n % OR 95% CI AOR 95% CI
Age Categories
  18–29 267 51.0 666 55.7 411 61.9 Ref
  30–44 165 31.5 362 30.3 174 26.2 0.55 0.38 0.81
  45+ 92 17.6 168 14.1 79 11.9 0.54 0.32 0.91
Sexual Orientation
  Gay 445 84.9 1051 87.9 580 87.4 Ref
  Bisexual 45 8.6 83 6.9 41 6.2 0.87 0.46 1.67
  Other 34 6.5 62 5.2 43 6.5 2.04 0.93 4.47
Race/Ethnicity
  White 390 74.4 900 75.3 488 73.5 Ref
  Asian 60 11.5 123 10.3 80 12.1 1.52 0.86 2.67
  Aboriginal 29 5.5 53 4.4 25 3.8 0.64 0.28 1.50
  Other 45 8.6 120 10.0 71 10.7 1.08 0.60 1.94
Annual Income ($CAD)
  <$30,000 313 59.7 694 58.0 414 62.4 Ref Ref
  ≥$30,000 211 40.3 502 42.0 250 37.7 0.64 0.45 0.91 0.65 0.46 0.93
Relationship status
  Not partnered 323 61.6 769 64.3 459 69.1 Ref
  Partnered, but not married/common law 110 21.0 250 20.9 134 20.2 0.74 0.48 1.14
  Partnered, and married/common law 91 17.4 177 14.8 71 10.7 0.38 0.24 0.63
Last HIV test
  <6 months ago 198 48.4 542 58.3 294 56.5 Ref
  6 months – 2 years ago 151 36.9 283 30.4 168 32.3 1.17 0.77 1.80
  >2 years ago 33 8.1 53 5.7 29 5.6 0.99 0.44 2.23
  Never tested 27 6.6 52 5.6 29 5.6 0.92 0.40 2.09
Prevention practices (mutually exclusive;
referent: don’t use)
  Consistent condoms “Always using
condoms for anal sex”
335 64.4 739 62.2 526 79.3 6.48 4.59 9.14 4.04 2.74 5.95
  Strategic positioning “Being the top for
anal sex”
138 26.5 344 29.0 149 22.5 0.48 0.33 0.70
  Anal abstinence “Having sex which
doesn’t include anal sex”
258 49.6 477 40.2 269 40.6 1.09 0.77 1.55
  Sero-sorting “Having anal sex without
condoms only with guys I know are HIV-
negative”
182 35.0 476 40.1 192 29.0 0.31 0.22 0.44 0.50 0.35 0.73
  Withdrawal “Not letting my sex partners
cum inside me”
146 28.1 354 29.8 192 29.0 0.93 0.64 1.36
  Ask Status “Asking my sex partners about
their HIV status before sex”
326 62.7 793 66.8 418 63.1 0.73 0.51 1.06
TasP awareness: “heard of the term
treatment as prevention”
  No 299 57.2 699 58.5 381 57.5 Ref
  Yes 224 42.8 496 41.5 282 42.5 1.15 0.81 1.63
TasP-related prevention practice:
“Having anal sex without condoms with
HIV-positive guys who have low viral loads
or are on HIV treatment”
  Yes 469 90.2 1028 86.5 625 94.3 Ref
  No 51 9.8 160 13.5 38 5.7 0.18 0.10 0.31
TasP-related attitude: “Knowing a sex
partner’s viral load is just as important as
knowing their HIV status”
  Disagree 163 31.8 357 30.6 220 33.6 Ref Ref
  Agree 349 68.2 811 69.4 434 66.4 0.75 0.51 1.09 0.70 0.47 1.03
Psychosocial factors (mutually exclusive) median Q1,Q3 median Q1,Q3 median Q1,Q3 OR 95% CI AOR 95% CI

  Treatment Optimism 24 20, 27 24 20, 27 23 20, 25 0.90 0.87 0.93
  Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale 30 28, 33 31 28, 34 30 28, 33 0.90 0.86 0.94
  Escape Motivation 28 24, 32 29 25, 33 28 24, 32 0.96 0.93 0.98 0.96 0.93 0.99
  Sexual Altruism – Personal 3.57 3, 4 3.43 3, 4 3.57 3, 4 2.25 1.60 3.16
  Sexual Altruism – Communal 3.67 3, 4 3.50 3, 4 3.67 3, 4 2.35 1.80 3.08 1.64 1.22 2.21
  HAD – Anxiety 8 5, 10 8 5, 10 8 5, 10 1.03 0.99 1.08
  HAD – Depression 3 1, 6 3 1, 5 3 2, 6 1.05 1.00 1.11

95% CI = 95% confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; $CAD = Canadian dollars; Q1,Q3 = first quartile, third quartile values. Bolded text indicates statistical significant at p<0.05.

*

The multivariable model also includes event-level factors listed in Table 2.