Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166910

Table 2. Effect of S deficiency on relative expression of genes: AtSultr1.1, AtSultr2.1, AtSDI1 and AtAPR3 in roots of sultr1.1 and sultr1.2 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana expressed relatively to wildtype Col-0 grown under sufficient S supply (Control).

Arabidopsis mutants
Col-0 sultr1.1 KO sultr1.2 (sel1-8)
Gene expression Control Low S Control Low S Control Low S
AtSultr1.1 1.0±0.20a 15.5±4.99b 0c 0c 13.8±0.23b 74.4±9.40d
AtSultr1.2 1.0±0.12a 3.2±0.61b 1.0±0.07a 1.8±1.06a 3.4±0.52b 4.4±0.53b
AtSDI1 1.0±0.13a 41.9±14.31b 1.5±0.31a 81.6±37.03b 19.0±2.40b 167.2±16.59c
AtAPR3 1.0±0.14a 3.6±0.53b 1.1±0.08a 4.3±0.19b 2.7±0.09a 5.0±0.11c
Leaf concentration
S (mg.g-1 DW) 11.8±0.44a 5.3±0.06b 12.7±0.27a 5.6±0.03b 6.9±0.09d 5.0±0.11b
Mo (ug.g-1 DW) 28.7±1.22a 192.7±10.49b 31.9±0.55a 170.0±10.49b 16.3±0.33c 134.9±5.07d
[Mo]:[S].104 24.2±0.12a 365±5.7b 25.14±0.73a 304±18.0c 23.7±0.44a 270±7.4c

In the sultr1.2 mutant the transcript was present, because the gene is inactivated by a point mutation in coding sequence [38]. Leaf concentrations of S and Mo and the [Mo] to [S] ratios (i.e. [Mo]:[S] multiplied by 104 for easier reading) are also given for the same plants. Values from the same line (i.e. between genotypes and S treatments for a given transcript or a nutrient concentration) are significantly different at P<0.05 when marked by different letters. Data are given as the mean ± SE (n = 3 for PCR analysis, n = 4 for S and Mo analysis).