. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166983

Table 4. Results of AMOVA of cpDNA data from 19 populations of S. cordifolia and 21 populations of V. argenteria.

df: degree of freedom; SS: sum of square; variation %: percentage of total variance; ** P<0.001.

Species	Source of variation	df	SS	Variation%	F statistic
S. cordifolia
	Among population	18	170.409	77.96**	F_ST = 0.77957
	Within population	75	38.400	22.04
	Among SIDIER groups	1	117.707	70.65**	F_CT = 0.70655
	Among population within groups	17	52.702	14.84**	F_SC = 0.50558
	Within population	75	38.400	14.51**	F_ST = 0.85491
	Among SAMOVA groups	2	143.813	77.32**	F_CT = 0.77320
	Among population within groups	16	26.595	7.09**	F_SC = 0.31259
	Within population	75	38.400	15.59**	F_ST = 0.84409
V. argenteria
	Among population	20	768.596	90.20**	F_ST = 0.90196
	Within population	59	63.217	9.80
	Among SIDIER groups	1	399.431	69.37**	F_CT = 0.69369
	Among population within groups	19	369.165	25.12**	F_SC = 0.82023
	Within population	59	63.217	5.51**	F_ST = 0.94493
	Among SAMOVA groups		707.960	85.18**	F_CT = 0.85175
	Among population within groups		60.636	7.69**	F_SC = 0.51905
	Within population		63.217	7.13**	F_ST = 0.92870