Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):1109–1120. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0491

Table 3. Multivariate analysis of prognostic features that showed significant results in univariate analysis.

Prognostic feature P value OR 95% CI
Gender [male/female] 0.185 2.745 0.618 12.193
ECOG 1 vs. 0 0.020 0.336 0.134 0.842
ECOG 2 vs. 0 0.047 0.121 0.015 0.974
ICIQ group mild vs. moderate 0.394 1.76 0.48 6.449
ICIQ group mild vs. severe 0.382 0.504 0.109 2.342
Surgeon experience <100 vs. >100 prev. rCx [y/n] 0.021 3.442 1.203 9.847
Nerve-sparing [y/n] 0.165 2.029 0.747 5.511
Radiation therapy [y/n] 0.999 0 0 .
Symptoms [y/n] 0.109 0.458 0.176 1.192
Urge [y/n] 0.259 0.486 0.139 1.702
Daytime continence [y/n] 0.032 3.131 1.101 8.908
Daily pad usage 2 vs. 0-1 0.817 0.859 0.238 3.105
Daily pad usage >2 vs. 0-1 0.995 0.996 0.274 3.616

CI = confidence interval; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score; ICIQ = International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire; OR = odds ratio; RCX = radical cystectomy.

A p value >0.05 was considered statistically signifcant.