Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2016 Oct 1;339:235–253. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.043

Fig. 7. Effect of Sur-LHS on sources of modulation and on receptive fields of F- and E-neurons.

Fig. 7

(A,B) Percentage of F- and E-neurons (A and B, respectively) receiving different combinations of tilt-related somatosensory inputs from the limbs (Types 1–4) in control and after LHS. See text for explanation. (C) Proportion of neurons receiving sensory inputs from different sources, i.e., from receptors of only one muscle (1 muscle), from receptors of more than one muscle (>1 muscle), from cutaneous and muscle receptors (Skin/fur+muscle), from cutaneous receptors only (Skin/fur), and with no receptive field found (Not found) in rabbits with an intact spinal cord (Control) and in rabbits with LHS. See text for explanation. (D) Proportion of neurons in which response to tilts could be completely explained (Expl), partly explained (Partly expl) and could not be explained (Not expl) by input from their receptive field, in rabbits with an intact spinal cord (Control) and in rabbits with LHS. In (A–D) the data for neurons recorded on the side of LHS (Ipsi-LHS) and the data for neurons recorded on the intact side (Co-LHS) are shown separately.