Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 22;13(9):566–579. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.35

Table 2.

Comparison of main characteristics of neoadjuvant and adjuvant trials

Parameter Neoadjuvant trials Adjuvant trials
Definition Treatment given before surgery Treatment given after surgery
Sample size Smaller Larger
End points Response rates and duration (pCR, EFS) Relapse and survival (DFS, overall survival)
Time taken to complete Months Years
Costs Lower Higher
Advantages Tumour downstaging—that is, converting a previously unresectable, locally advanced breast cancer to an operable tumour
Enables early assessment of response to treatment
Response-guided therapeutic planning is possible
Enables comparison of the characteristics of pretreatment and post-treatment tumour samples (in those without a pCR), which might facilitate biomarker discovery, prognostication, patient stratification, and assessment of responses to therapy
Designed to increase the chance of long-term survival
Quality-of-life questionnaires can be used to assess the long-term effects of treatment in multiple domains
Disadvantages Local tumour control might be delayed
Complicates pathological assessments and staging
In some circumstances, duration of drug exposure is shorter, which might reduce its effectiveness
Less long-term safety information is available
Potential for selection of resistant clones owing to relatively high disease burden at the time of systemic treatment
Risk of exposing a large number of patients to treatment that is more toxic and/or no more (or even less) effective than the current standard of care
Precludes assessment of response to systemic treatment and, thus, does not enable response-guided treatment planning

DFS, disease-free survival; EFS, event-free survival; pCR, pathological complete response.