Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 10;116(11):2167–2176. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3459-y

Table 5.

Model fitting results

Model −2LL df Compared to Χ 2 Δdf p
1 Cholesky ACE 23,466 3257
2 Cholesky AE 23,488 3285 1 22 28 0.816
3 Cholesky AE—HR and resting vagal tone 23,500 3291 2 12 6 0.063
4 Cholesky AE—HRR and vagal rebound 23,506 3295 3 6 4 0.193
5 Cholesky AE—vagal exercise recovery and EB 23,512 3299 4 6 4 0.186