TABLE 2.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of outcomes for patients who were or were not taking MHSs and were being treated for prostate cancer with the use of definitive IMRT1
MHS nonusers with events (total n = 1990), n (%) | % (95% CI) | MHS users with events (total n = 217), n (%) | % (95% CI) | Log-rank P | sHR (95% CI) | P | |
5-y FFBF all | 185 (9) | 89 (87, 91) | 17 (8) | 94 (89, 96) | 0.12 | 0.75 (0.45, 1.23 | 0.25 |
Low risk | — | 96 (93, 97) | — | 99 (91, 100) | 0.37 | — | — |
Intermediate risk | — | 87 (83, 90) | — | 88 (76, 94) | 0.68 | — | — |
High risk | — | 78 (72, 84) | — | 88 (66, 96) | 0.27 | — | — |
5-y FFDM | 64 (3) | 96 (95, 97) | 5 (2) | 97 (93, 99) | 0.32 | 0.75 (0.30, 1.88 | 0.54 |
5-y CSS | 25 (1) | 99 (98, 100) | 1 (1) | 100 (96, 100) | 0.22 | 0.41 (0.05, 3.16 | 0.39 |
5-y OS | 171 (9) | 92 (91, 94) | 10 (5) | 97 (93, 99) | 0.012 | 0.61 (0.32, 1.16 | 0.133 |
Columns on the left side (number of events, their 95% CIs, and the log-rank P values) of the table (Kaplan Meier analysis) were unadjusted. Adjusted ratios are provided on the right side (sHRs and P values) of the table. CSS, cancer-specific survival; FFBF, freedom from biochemical failure; FFDM, freedom from distant metastasis; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy; MHS, men’s health supplement; OS, overall survival; sHR, subdistribution HR.
P < 0.05.