Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;104(6):1534–1544. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.137919

TABLE 5.

Reported nutrient intake at baseline (week 0) and postintervention (week 8) for whey protein, calcium-caseinate and control interventions1

Whey protein
Calcium caseinate
Control
Baseline Post Δ Baseline Post Δ Baseline Post Δ P2
Energy, MJ/d 9.5 ± 0.5 9.4 ± 0.5 −0.09 ± 0.4 9.6 ± 0.5 9.2 ± 0.4 −0.46 ± 0.3 9.2 ± 0.5 9.7 ± 0.5 0.50 ± 0.4 0.149
Total fat, % of TE 34.6 ± 1.0 32.2 ± 1.2 −2.4 ± 0.8 34.8 ± 1.2 31.8 ± 1.1 −3.0 ± 0.9 35.2 ± 1.2 32.3 ± 1.2 −2.9 ± 1.1 0.906
SFA, % of TE 12.9 ± 0.6 12.7 ± 0.8 −0.2 ± 0.6 12.4 ± 0.7 11.7 ± 0.7 −0.7 ± 0.4 13.4 ± 0.6 12.2 ± 0.7 −1.2 ± 0.6 0.391
MUFA, % of TE 11.7 ± 0.5 10.8 ± 0.4 −1.0 ± 0.3 12.0 ± 0.5 10.9 ± 0.4 −1.1 ± 0.4 12.3 ± 0.6 11.0 ± 0.5 −1.3 ± 0.5 0.981
n–6 PUFA, % of TE 4.81 ± 0.2 4.11 ± 0.2 −0.70 ± 0.2 5.22 ± 0.4 4.23 ± 0.2 −0.99 ± 0.3 4.58 ± 0.3 4.37 ± 0.3 −0.21 ± 0.3 0.464
n–3 PUFA, % of TE 0.78 ± 0.1 0.79 ± 0.1 0.01 ± 0.6 0.84 ± 0.1 0.85 ± 0.1 0.01 ± 0.6 0.74 ± 0.1 0.71 ± 0.1 −0.03 ± 0.6 0.495
Total PUFA, % of TE 5.59 ± 0.3 5.04 ± 0.3 −0.55 ± 0.4 6.06 ± 0.4 4.81 ± 0.3 −1.24 ± 0.4 5.32 ± 0.3 5.08 ± 0.3 −0.24 ± 0.4 0.456
trans Fat, % of TE 0.88 ± 0.1 0.90 ± 0.1 0.02 ± 0.1 0.97 ± 0.1 0.95 ± 0.1 −0.02 ± 0.1 1.00 ± 0.1 0.97 ± 0.1 −0.03 ± 0.1 0.972
Protein, % of TE 16.0 ± 0.5 24.4 ± 0.9 8.4 ± 0.8a 15.9 ± 0.5 24.4 ± 0.7 8.5 ± 0.6a 16.2 ± 0.6 15.2 ± 0.6 −1.00 ± 0.6b <0.001
Carbohydrates, % of TE 49.4 ± 1.3 44.0 ± 1.2 −5.5 ± 1.0a 49.7 ± 1.4 43.7 ± 1.4 −6.0 ± 1.3a 48.5 ± 1.7 54.8 ± 1.6 6.3 ± 1.9b <0.001
Alcohol, % of TE 3.02 ± 0.7 2.60 ± 0.5 −0.42 ± 0.5 2.59 ± 0.6 2.76 ± 0.6 0.18 ± 0.4 3.20 ± 0.7 2.48 ± 0.7 −0.72 ± 0.6 0.066
Dietary fiber (AOAC), g/d 22.6 ± 1.4 20.1 ± 1.2 −2.49 ± 1.1 23.0 ± 1.4 20.5 ± 1.2 −2.56 ± 0.8 21.3 ± 1.1 20.4 ± 1.3 −0.92 ± 0.9 0.399
Sodium, g/d 3.18 ± 0.2 3.12 ± 0.2 −0.07 ± 0.2 3.37 ± 0.2 2.81 ± 0.2 −0.57 ± 0.2 3.57 ± 0.5 2.95 ± 0.2 −0.62 ± 0.5 0.215
Potassium, g/d 5.22 ± 1.2 5.21 ± 1.2 −0.01 ± 0.2 4.54 ± 0.7 4.71 ± 0.9 0.17 ± 0.4 4.10 ± 0.6 4.80 ± 0.9 0.70 ± 0.8 0.582
Calcium, g/d 1.06 ± 0.1 1.19 ± 0.1 0.13 ± 0.1b 1.09 ± 0.1 1.57 ± 0.1 0.48 ± 0.1a 0.97 ± 0.1 1.00 ± 0.1 0.03 ± 0.1b <0.001
1

All values are means ± SEMs. n = 38. Data were log transformed for alcohol intake. Baselines were not significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) from one another. Different superscript letters within a row refer to treatment groups different from one another (P ≤ 0.05). AOAC, Association of Official Analytic Chemists; TE, total energy; Δ change from baseline.

2

Overall between-group treatment effects for each Δ were obtained with the use of a linear mixed-model ANOVA with baseline values for the variable of interest and prognostic values such as age, sex, and BMI. Tukey-Kramer correction was used for the post hoc analysis to adjust for multiple testing.