Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 2;146(12):2567–2573. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.237271

TABLE 2.

Mean true and reported portion sizes and differences, mean ratio of amount reported to amount eaten, and proportion of reported portion sizes within 10% and 25% of truth for foods and drinks for which a match was reported, by recall mode, ASA24 and AMPM1

ASA24
AMPM
Observations, n Mean amount eaten, g Mean amount reported, g Difference,2 g Ratio of amount reported to amount eaten Within 10% of truth, % Within 25% of truth, % Observations, n Mean amount eaten, g Mean amount reported, g Difference,2 g Ratio of amount reported to amount eaten Within 10% of truth, % Within 25% of truth, %
All foods and drinks 801 104 108 3.68 (−3.76, 11.1) 0.977 (0.896, 1.06) 16.2 37.5 900 90 102 11.8 (5.75, 17.9) 1.17 (1.09, 1.25) 14.9 33.2
All foods excluding liquids 637 62.9 69.8 6.85 (0.471, 13.2) 0.98 (0.892, 1.08) 14.4 35.5 731 60.1 73.4 13.4 (7.99, 18.8) 1.21 (1.12, 1.3) 15.0 32.7
Liquids 164 264 255 −8.66 (−33.7, 16.4) 0.963 (0.839, 1.10) 23.2 45.1 169 219 225 5.13 (−14.7, 24.9) 1.00 (0.902, 1.11) 14.2 35.5
Amorphous or soft 303 66.1 80.5 14.4 (5.07, 23.8) 0.964 (0.859, 1.08) 7.92 28.4 338 62.8 83.7 20.9 (12.5, 29.3) 1.20 (1.09, 1.33) 12.4 32.8
Single unit 192 74.5 73.1 −1.42 (−8.26, 5.43) 1.02 (0.929, 1.12) 26.6 53.1 209 72.4 70.9 −1.48 (−6.03, 3.06) 1.04 (0.956, 1.13) 22.5 44.0
Small pieces 60 17.9 21.8 3.89 (−3.22, 11) 1.17 (0.837, 1.65) 6.67 16.7 83 18.3 40.1 21.8 (11.7, 31.9) 1.97 (1.61, 2.41) 8.43 14.5
Shaped foods 47 94.3 95.5 1.22 (−15.7, 18.1) 0.887 (0.753, 1.05) 17.0 34.0 65 85.9 103 17.4 (0.989, 33.8) 1.08 (0.856, 1.36) 13.8 20.0
Spreads 35 7.61 6.97 −0.639 (−2.36, 1.08) 0.764 (0.596, 0.98) 14.3 34.3 36 12.1 14.7 2.59 (−2.38, 7.57) 1.24 (0.918, 1.67) 13.9 30.6
1

Values are means (95% CIs) unless otherwise indicated. ASA24, n = 40 individuals and 801 observations; AMPM, n = 41 individuals and 900 observations. AMPM, Automated Multiple-Pass Method; ASA24, Automated Self-Administered 24-hour.

2

Expressed as reported minus true portion size. Thus, positive differences are indicative of overestimation and negative differences are indicative of underestimation of portion size.