Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 19;146(12):2445–2460. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.238923

TABLE 3.

Percent abundance of cecal bacteria phyla and significantly altered taxa in male mice fed a 45%-fat diet with or without an ETWB supplement for 10 wk1

Control ETWB Percentage difference (ETWB relative to control)2 P3
Phylum
 Tenericutes 0.08 ± 0.01 0.20 ± 0.04 150 0.0042
 Bacteroidetes 30.8 ± 1.9 43.8 ± 2.7 42 0.0014
 Firmicutes 63.6 ± 1.7 53.5 ± 3.0 −16 0.0079
 Actinobacteria 1.19 ± 0.40 0.99 ± 0.28 −17 1.00
 Verrucomicrobia 4.22 ± 0.54 1.49 ± 0.40 −65 0.0003
 Proteobacteria 0.05 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.01 −80 0.0015
Taxon4
 p__Firmicutes; g__Dorea 0.06 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.07 416 0.0008
 p__Tenericutes; o__RF39 0.07 ± 0.01 0.19 ± 0.04 175 0.0056
 p__Firmicutes; g__Adlercreutzia 0.09 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.02 99 0.0115
 p__Bacteroidetes; f__Rikenellaceae 4.75 ± 0.43 9.41 ± 0.88 98 0.0010
 p__Firmicutes; f__Ruminococcaceae 3.59 ± 0.62 5.81 ± 0.49 62 0.0057
 p__Bacteroidetes; f__S24-7 26.1 ± 2.0 34.4 ± 2.3 32 0.0392
 p__Verrucomicrobia; g__Akkermansia 4.22 ± 0.54 1.49 ± 0.40 −65 0.0007
 p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia 4.40 ± 0.47 1.50 ± 0.18 −66 <0.0001
 p__Firmicutes; g__Streptococcus 0.12 ± 0.10 0.04 ± 0.36 −72 <0.0001
 p__Firmicutes; g__Turicibacter 5.91 ± 0.88 1.08 ± 0.27 −82 0.0010
 p__Firmicutes; o__Clostridiales 0.95 ± 0.18 0.08 ± 0.10 −91 <0.0001
 p__Firmicutes; f__Peptostreptococcaceae 0.60 ± 0.17 0.01 ± 0.01 −98 0.0384
1

Values are means ± SEMs, n = 15/group. c_, class; ETWB, enzyme-treated wheat bran; f_, family; g_, genus; o_, order; p_, phylum.

2

Percentage difference = [(ETWB − control)/control] × 100.

3

Group comparisons were assessed by Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were adjusted for false discovery rate correction. Significance was set at an adjusted P value ≤0.05.

4

Reported taxa included had a minimum of 0.05% mean abundance in each group and an adjusted P value ≤0.05. Bacteria are listed to the lowest level of classification (i.e., if the last taxon assignment is f_, “family” is the lowest level of classification).