TABLE 3.
Control | ETWB | Percentage difference (ETWB relative to control)2 | P3 | |
Phylum | ||||
Tenericutes | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 150 | 0.0042 |
Bacteroidetes | 30.8 ± 1.9 | 43.8 ± 2.7 | 42 | 0.0014 |
Firmicutes | 63.6 ± 1.7 | 53.5 ± 3.0 | −16 | 0.0079 |
Actinobacteria | 1.19 ± 0.40 | 0.99 ± 0.28 | −17 | 1.00 |
Verrucomicrobia | 4.22 ± 0.54 | 1.49 ± 0.40 | −65 | 0.0003 |
Proteobacteria | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | −80 | 0.0015 |
Taxon4 | ||||
p__Firmicutes; g__Dorea | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 416 | 0.0008 |
p__Tenericutes; o__RF39 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 175 | 0.0056 |
p__Firmicutes; g__Adlercreutzia | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 99 | 0.0115 |
p__Bacteroidetes; f__Rikenellaceae | 4.75 ± 0.43 | 9.41 ± 0.88 | 98 | 0.0010 |
p__Firmicutes; f__Ruminococcaceae | 3.59 ± 0.62 | 5.81 ± 0.49 | 62 | 0.0057 |
p__Bacteroidetes; f__S24-7 | 26.1 ± 2.0 | 34.4 ± 2.3 | 32 | 0.0392 |
p__Verrucomicrobia; g__Akkermansia | 4.22 ± 0.54 | 1.49 ± 0.40 | −65 | 0.0007 |
p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia | 4.40 ± 0.47 | 1.50 ± 0.18 | −66 | <0.0001 |
p__Firmicutes; g__Streptococcus | 0.12 ± 0.10 | 0.04 ± 0.36 | −72 | <0.0001 |
p__Firmicutes; g__Turicibacter | 5.91 ± 0.88 | 1.08 ± 0.27 | −82 | 0.0010 |
p__Firmicutes; o__Clostridiales | 0.95 ± 0.18 | 0.08 ± 0.10 | −91 | <0.0001 |
p__Firmicutes; f__Peptostreptococcaceae | 0.60 ± 0.17 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | −98 | 0.0384 |
Values are means ± SEMs, n = 15/group. c_, class; ETWB, enzyme-treated wheat bran; f_, family; g_, genus; o_, order; p_, phylum.
Percentage difference = [(ETWB − control)/control] × 100.
Group comparisons were assessed by Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were adjusted for false discovery rate correction. Significance was set at an adjusted P value ≤0.05.
Reported taxa included had a minimum of 0.05% mean abundance in each group and an adjusted P value ≤0.05. Bacteria are listed to the lowest level of classification (i.e., if the last taxon assignment is f_, “family” is the lowest level of classification).