Skip to main content
. 2016 Autumn;9(4):250–258.

Table 4.

Total and familial effects of conclusive socioeconomic and education states on the number (%) of the Hepatitis C virus transmission, based on virus genome and anti-Hepatitis C virus antibody detection

Variable Total positive cases
Familial comparison
A
(PCR)
P B
(serology)
P C
(Unaffected
family)
P D
(Affected
family)
P
CSESa 0.002 0.013 0.298 0.019
Low 10 (22.2) 10 (18.9) 16 (8.8) 6 (5.7)
Middle 24 (53.3) 30 (56.6) 117 (64.6) 81 (76.4)
High 11 (24.4) 13 (24.5) 48 (26.5) 19 (17.9)
Education 0.449 0.646 0.103 0.328
Illiterate 5 (11.1) 5 (9.4) 7 (13) 11 (10.5)
Elementary education 4 (8.9) 5 (9.4) 5 (9.3) 16 (15.2)
Secondary education 17 (37.8) 18 (34.0) 20 (37.0) 29 (27.6)
High school education 4 (8.9) 6 (11.3) 9 (16.7) 13 (12.4)
Diploma 12 (26.6) 15 (28.3) 7 (13.0) 20 (19.0)
Associate degree 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Bachelor and higher 3 (6.7) 4 (7.5) 6 (11.1) 15 (14.3)
Religious degrees 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1.0)

A: Hepatitis C RNA positive; B: anti-Hepatitis C virus antibody positive; C: Family with only one hepatitis C virus genome positive; D, Family with more than one infected person.

a

Conclusive socioeconomic state.