Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 22.
Published in final edited form as: Matern Child Health J. 2007 Jun 7;12(1):75–82. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0223-2

Table 3.

Unadjusted odds ratios between topic discussed and covariates

Covariate VP counseling topics OR (P value)

Gun storage Gun removal Limiting exposure to media violence Discipline techniques
Patient age groupb 1.10 (.06) 1.15 (.004) 1.75 (<.001) .41 (<.0001)
Practice areac .63 (.17) 1.09 (.81) .85 (.54) .90 (.81)
Practice settingd .92 (.77) 1.06 (.85) .33 (.001) .92 (.79)
Gendere .77 (.17) 0.81 (.31) .66 (.02) .65 (.03)
Pediatrician Agef 1.00 (.62) 1.00 (0.93) .99 (.53) 1.01 (.53)
Time addressing VP issues**f .38 (<.0001) 0.33 (<.0001) .49 (.0001) .62 (.02)
Percentage well-child exams*f 1.02 (.68) 1.04 (.55) 1.02 (.79) 1.29 (.004)
Perceived self-efficacya 8.26 (<.0001) 8.47 (<.0001) 4.30 (<.0001) 3.57 (<.001)
Confidencea 6.43(<.0001) 5.91 (<.0001) 6.31 (<.0001) 3.62 (<.001)
a

Comparison group: strongly disagree/disagree/neutral

b

Comparison group: age 2–5

c

Comparison group: rural

d

Comparison group: others

e

Comparison group: female

f

Continuous variable

**

Odds ratio between two consecutive categories (too much time verus about right, and about right versus too little time)

*

Odds ratio is the odds between a level of proportion of child care visit to a level that has 10 percent more well child care visit