Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Condens Matter. 2016 Jul 1;28(34):344002. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/34/344002

Table 10.

Bootstrap statistical comparison between predicted ΔH (all UC and NgB corrections) or Δε (uncorrected 3D-RISM and parameter free corrections) and ΔH from experiment for neutral molecules (Abraham and Cabani datasets).

ΔHε
Slope y-intercept R2 RMSE MUE
PSE-3 1.19(7) 1.1(8) 0.799(2) 2.77(1) 2.028(8)
UCT-PSE-3 0.88(5) −1.4(6) 0.805(1) 1.853(5) 1.508(5)
NgB-PSE-3 1.18(7) 1.1(8) 0.799(2) 2.77(1) 2.036(8)
PC+/3D-RISM-PSE-3 0.98(6) 0.4(7) 0.797(2) 2.120(6) 1.673(6)