Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Condens Matter. 2016 Jul 1;28(34):344002. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/34/344002

Table 11.

Bootstrap statistical comparison between predicted ΔH (all UC and NgB corrections) or Δε (uncorrected 3D-RISM and parameter free corrections) and ΔH from experiment for ions (Fawcett and Marcus datasets).

ΔHε
Slope y-intercept R2 RMSE MUE
PSE-3 0.89(9) −11(8) 0.853(2) 8.09(6) 6.30(4)
UCT-PSE-3 0.83(9) −17(9) 0.869(2) 7.84(5) 6.00(4)
NgB-PSE-3 0.89(9) −11(8) 0.850(3) 8.10(6) 6.29(4)
PC+/3D-RISM-PSE-3 0.80(8) −17(8) 0.864(2) 7.84(5) 5.98(4)