Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;10(10):481–487. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2015.0080

Table 5.

Association Between Mastitis and Breastfeeding Outcomes in Nepal in 2014

  Breastfeeding outcome    
Breastfeeding practices Yes (%) No (%) Adjusted odds ratio(95% confidence interval)a p value
Exclusive breastfeeding in
 4th month (n = 328)
  Mastitis (n = 27) 6 (4.8) 21 (10.3) 0.47 (0.15, 1.50) 0.204
  No mastitis (n = 301) 118 (95.2) 183 (89.7) 1.00  
 6th month (n = 327)
  Mastitis (n = 27) 0 (0.0) 27 (8.9) NA  
  No mastitis (n = 300) 24 (100.0) 276 (91.1)    
Predominant breastfeeding in
 4th month (n = 328)
  Mastitis (n = 27) 11 (5.8) 16 (11.6) 0.66 (0.25, 1.75) 0.399
  No mastitis (n = 301) 179 (94.2) 122 (88.4) 1.00  
 6th month (n = 327)
  Mastitis (n = 27) 2 (4.4) 25 (8.9) NA  
  No mastitis (n = 300) 43 (95.6) 257 (91.1)    
Any breastfeeding in
 4th month (n = 328)
  Mastitis (n = 27) 27 (8.3) 0 (0.0) NA  
  No mastitis (n = 301) 299 (91.7) 2 (100.0)    
 6th month (n = 327)
  Mastitis (n = 27) 26 (8.0) 1 (33.3) NA  
  No mastitis (n = 300) 298 (92.0) 2 (66.7)    

Each row presents the result from logistic regression.

a

Adjusted for maternal education, maternal age, place of residence, mode of delivery, birth weight, time of initiation of breastfeeding, and place of delivery.

NA, not applicable due to small numbers.