Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 19;87(6):554–559. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1246316

Table 5.

Revision ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HRA devices compared to BHR. Data are based on a Cox regression model including implant design, sex, and femoral head diameter (categorized as ≤44 mm, 45–49 mm, 50–54 mm, and ≥55 mm). Age group, hospital volume (≥ 100 or <100 procedures) and diagnosis had no significant effect on adjustment (data not shown)

RR 95% CI of RR p-value
BHR (reference) 1.00
Cormet 1.05 0.59–1.87 0.9
ASR 3.96 3.20–4.91 < 0.001
ReCap 1.21 0.88–1.67 0.2
Durom 1.02 0.65–1.58 0.9
Conserve Plus 1.30 0.90–1.88 0.2
Female (male reference) 2.12 1.66–2.70 < 0.001
Femoral head diameter, mm
 < 44 (reference) 1.00
 45–49 0.70 0.54–0.92 0.01
 50–54 0.61 0.44–0.85 0.003
 ≥ 55 0.46 0.27–0.77 0.003