Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 19;87(6):554–559. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1246316

Table 6.

Revision ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in 6 HRA devices compared to the uncemented reference THA. Data are based on a Cox regression model at different follow-up time intervals (the first year, the second and third years, and from the fourth year onwards)

Follow-up interval: 1st year
Follow-up interval: 2nd and 3rd year
Follow-up: from 4th year onwards
RR 95% CI for RR p-value RR 95% CI for RR p-value RR 95% CI for RR p-value
Reference THA 1 1 1
BHR 0.48 0.32–0.70 0.0002 0.83 0.54–1.26 0.4 1.66 1.31–2.11 < 0.001
Cormet 0.67 0.17–2.70 0.6 1.84 0.58–5.81 0.3 2.06 1.02–4.18 0.04
ASR 0.58 0.36–0.94 0.03 1.85 1.24–2.77 0.003 9.18 7.44–11.31 < 0.001
ReCap 0.64 0.38–1.07 0.09 0.82 0.44–1.53 0.5 2.30 1.55–3.42 < 0.001
Durom 0.58 0.26–1.31 0.2 1.44 0.70–2.95 0.3 1.15 0.59–2.25 0.7
Conserve Plus 1.00 0.61–1.64 1.0 0.78 0.36–1.68 0.5 1.78 1.03–3.08 0.04