Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 17;8(5):458–465. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201505952

Figure 1. The PS1 L435F FAD mutant strongly impairs APP processing while generating Aβ43.

Figure 1

Pooled clones (A–D) and single‐cell clones (E–H) of HEK293/sw cells untransfected or stably transfected with the indicated WT and mutant PS1 constructs were analyzed for γ‐secretase expression and APP processing.
  1. PS1, PS2, and NCT were analyzed in cell lysates by immunoblotting using antibodies PS1N (PS1), BI‐HF5C (PS2), and N1660 (NCT), respectively.
  2. Full‐length APP and APP CTFs were analyzed by immunoblotting using antibody 6687.
  3. Conditioned media were analyzed for secreted APPs by immunoblotting using antibody 22C11 and for total Aβ by combined immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting using antibodies 3552/2D8.
  4. Conditioned media were analyzed for individual Aβ species on Tris‐Bicine‐Urea SDS‐PAGE by combined immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting of Aβ using antibodies 3552/2D8. Pooled clones of HEK293/sw cells stably transfected with PS1 L166P were used as reference. Note that more sample was loaded for the PS1 L435F mutant to facilitate analysis.
  5. PS1 expression levels were analyzed in cell lysates of HEK293/sw cells stably expressing PS1 WT or PS1 L435F by immunoblotting using antibodies PS1NT and 5E12, respectively.
  6. Conditioned media were analyzed by ELISA specific for Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ43. Data represent mean ± s.e.m. (n = 6). Absolute levels and Aβ ratios are shown.
  7. ecreted Aβ was analyzed as in (D). To verify individual Aβ species, Aβ standards were co‐migrated.
  8. Total Aβ in conditioned media was analyzed by MALDI‐TOF MS following immunoprecipitation with antibody 4G8. Observed (Aβ42, 4513.6; Aβ43, 4615.3) and predicted molecular masses (Aβ42, 4514.1; Aβ43, 4615.2) were in good agreement.
Source data are available online for this figure.