Table 3.
SRS Pain |
SRS Function |
SRS Mental Health |
SRS Self- Image |
SRS Subscore |
ODI | SF-12 MCS |
SF-12 PCS |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continuous Radiographic Variable Correlations (Pearson) | |||||||||
Lumbar Cobb (LC- degrees) N= 286 |
r | .137 | .128 | .084 | −.070 | .094 | −.112 | .099 | .117 |
Coronal Vertical Axis (CVA-cm) N=286 |
r | −.048 | −.066 | −.036 | −.178 | −.106 | .109 | −.061 | −.081 |
Pelvic Tilt (PT-degrees) N=269 |
r | −.017 | −.148 | .042 | −.099 | −.069 | .105 | .093 | −.162 |
PI-LL Mismatch (degrees) N=277 |
r | −.012 | −.141 | .040 | −.144 | −.080 | .151 | .068 | −.169 |
Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA-cm) N=285 |
r | −.052 | −.206 | −.009 | −.191 | −.146 | .236 | −.054 | −.176 |
T12 – Sacrum (LL- degrees) N=286 |
r | −.089 | −.192 | −.023 | −.165 | −.151 | .190 | −.016 | −.197 |
Pelvic Incidence (PI – degrees) N=277 |
r | .098 | .077 | .089 | .026 | .097 | −.056 | .107 | .050 |
Sacral Slope (SS - degrees) N=286 |
r | .125 | .208 | .035 | .111 | .155 | −.167 | .033 | .198 |
Radiographic Modifier Group Correlations (Spearman) | |||||||||
Lumbar Cobb Group N=286 |
r | .121 | .148 | .078 | −.024 | .091 | −0.130 | .105 | .101 |
CVA Modifier Group N=285 |
r | .012 | −.048 | −.012 | −.144 | −.057 | 0.081 | −.062 | −.025 |
PI-LL Mismatch Modifier Group N=277 |
r | −.016 | −.151 | .060 | −.088 | −.067 | .137 | .083 | −.174 |
PT Modifier Group N=269 |
r | −.068 | −0.163 | −.027 | −.061 | −.101 | 0.142 | .046 | −.193 |
SVA Modifier Group N=285 |
r | −.069 | −.204 | −.049 | −.166 | −.155 | .230 | −.103 | −.165 |
Greater sagittal imbalance was weakly correlated with higher (more pathology) ODI scores (r=.236) and lower (more pathology) SRS Function scores (−.206). This was also true for the SVA Modifier group as well. Greater sacral slope was weakly correlated with higher (less pathology) SRS Function domain scores.