Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Nov 15;41(22):1701–1708. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001613

Table 3.

Population Correlation Coefficients between Baseline Radiographic Parameters and Radiographic Modifier Groups and Baseline PROs

SRS
Pain
SRS
Function
SRS Mental
Health
SRS Self-
Image
SRS
Subscore
ODI SF-12
MCS
SF-12
PCS
Continuous Radiographic Variable Correlations (Pearson)
Lumbar Cobb (LC-
degrees) N= 286
r .137 .128 .084 −.070 .094 −.112 .099 .117
Coronal Vertical Axis
(CVA-cm) N=286
r −.048 −.066 −.036 −.178 −.106 .109 −.061 −.081
Pelvic Tilt (PT-degrees)
N=269
r −.017 −.148 .042 −.099 −.069 .105 .093 −.162
PI-LL Mismatch
(degrees) N=277
r −.012 −.141 .040 −.144 −.080 .151 .068 −.169
Sagittal Vertical Axis
(SVA-cm) N=285
r −.052 −.206 −.009 −.191 −.146 .236 −.054 −.176
T12 – Sacrum (LL-
degrees) N=286
r −.089 −.192 −.023 −.165 −.151 .190 −.016 −.197
Pelvic Incidence (PI –
degrees) N=277
r .098 .077 .089 .026 .097 −.056 .107 .050
Sacral Slope (SS -
degrees) N=286
r .125 .208 .035 .111 .155 −.167 .033 .198
Radiographic Modifier Group Correlations (Spearman)
Lumbar Cobb Group
N=286
r .121 .148 .078 −.024 .091 −0.130 .105 .101
CVA Modifier Group
N=285
r .012 −.048 −.012 −.144 −.057 0.081 −.062 −.025
PI-LL Mismatch
Modifier Group
N=277
r −.016 −.151 .060 −.088 −.067 .137 .083 −.174
PT Modifier Group
N=269
r −.068 −0.163 −.027 −.061 −.101 0.142 .046 −.193
SVA Modifier Group
N=285
r −.069 −.204 −.049 −.166 −.155 .230 −.103 −.165

Greater sagittal imbalance was weakly correlated with higher (more pathology) ODI scores (r=.236) and lower (more pathology) SRS Function scores (−.206). This was also true for the SVA Modifier group as well. Greater sacral slope was weakly correlated with higher (less pathology) SRS Function domain scores.