Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 22;5:e19334. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19334

Figure 2. Animals exhibit increased sleep and arousal threshold after eating.

(A) Probability of sleep (Psleep) preceding or following each meal (t = 0) in Canton-S (top) or w1118 (bottom) males. Data are shown as averages of 1 min bins. ΔPsleep is defined as the difference between postprandial Psleep and the corresponding time-matched pre-meal Psleep (i.e. t1 – t−1, t2 – t−2, …). For clarity, a mirror image of pre-meal Psleep is replotted in the postprandial period (dashed line). Inset graphs show average Psleep (± s.e.m.) for the 20 min before (−20) and after (+20) meals, with the axis scaled to the parent graph. n = 757 meals from 50 flies, Canton-S; 661 meals from 30 flies, w1118; ***p<0.001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test. (B) ΔPsleep calculated from data in A. (C) Diagram of stimulus delivery system showing shaft-less vibration motors attached to the back of ARC chamber. Increasing vibrations are delivered to the chamber via a microcontroller using pulse width modulation. (D) Arousal threshold shows an initial increase with the time an animal is inactive. 180 flies, 11,479 arousal events, Canton-S; 5 min bins, circles represent mean ± s.e.m., a secondorder polynomial trendline is shown. (E) Superimposition of time inactive (blue) over Psleep (black) relative to meals during periodic vibrational stimuli. The inset graph shows Psleep and time inactive in the 20 min before and after each meal. n = 2245 meals from 180 flies, Canton-S; ***p<0.001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test. (F) Stimulus response from 0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 min pre- and post-meal (red) superimposed onto Psleep (black). Arousal events are filtered to 5 min intervals for prior time inactive to control for sleep depth (0–5 mins shown, minimum 1 s inactivity). Circles represent mean ± s.e.m.; n = 2245 meals from 180 flies, Canton-S; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, Mann Whitney test. (G) Percent of calculated sleep that is actual immobility versus grooming. The inset graph shows the percent grooming in the 20 min before and after each meal. n = 55 meals from seven flies, Canton-S; p=0.69, Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test. (H) Comparison of Psleep before and after meals calculated using immobility criteria "I" versus immobility criteria paired with grooming criteria "I, -G". Inset shows average Psleep (± s.e.m.) in the 20 min before and after each meal. ***p<0.001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19334.005

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Postprandial sleep is sex independent.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Canton-S males (blue) and females (red) demonstrate similar increases in postprandial sleep. n = 672 meals from 30 males; 730 meals from 30 females; ***p<0.001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test. (B) Probability of sleep initiation in 1 min windows surrounding feeding events for Canton-S (gray) and w1118 (red), with a quantification of sleep bout frequency in the 20 min before (+20) and after (−20) feeding events. ***p<0.001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Arousal threshold surrounding meals with increasing sleep duration state.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A) Stimulus response from 0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 min pre- and post-meal (red) superimposed onto Psleep (black) representing the entire data set. Arousal events are filtered to 5-min intervals for prior time inactive (0–5 min duplicated from Figure 2) to control for sleep depth. (B) Correlation between Psleep and arousal threshold for 0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 min bins surrounding feeding events (Pearson correlation, six time-bins derived from 2245 meals from 180 flies, Canton-S).

Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Grooming event influence on immobility based sleep.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

Ethograms of individual fly behavior in the 20 min before and after each meal, including immobility (purple), sleep (grey), grooming (blue), and recalculated sleep (red). n = 55 meals from seven flies, Canton-S.