Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 25;24(12):709–716. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0885-8

Table 2.

CMR findings in CFS patients and comparison with an age-matched control group of normal, female subjects

Variables CFS patients Control group Mean difference + 95 % CI p value
LVEDD (mm) 44 ± 3.7 49 ± 3.7 5 (2.68–7.66) <0.05
EDV (ml) 129.8 ± 16.0 148.9 ± 19.0 19.1 (6.75–31.47) <0.05
EDV/BSA (ml/m2) 77.5 ± 6.2 86.0 ± 9.3 8.4 (2.58–14.27) <0.05
LVESD (mm) 29.7 ± 4.1 30.5 ± 3.2 0.8 (−1.48–3.18) 0.47
ESV (ml) 54.7 ± 10.1 54.0 ± 9.2 0.7 (−6.99–5.71) 0.84
ESV/BSA (ml/m2) 32.6 ± 4.0 30.9 ± 4.8 1.7 ± 1.6 (−4.92–1.48) 0.29
IVS (mm) 7.9 ± 0.9 8.1 ± 1.1 0.3 (−0.44–0.97) 0.46
EDWM (g) 60.6 ± 10.6 86.6 ± 11.7 26.0 (18.30–33.70) <0.05
EDWM/BSA (g/m2) 39.8 ± 6.5 49.6 ± 7.1 9.9 (5.16–14.59) <0.05
SV (ml) 75.0 ± 8.9 96.2 ± 11.7 21.2 (13.68–28.73) <0.05
SV/BSA (ml/m2) 44.9 ± 4.5 54.9 ± 6.3 10.0 (6.07–14.03) <0.05
CO (l/min) 4.9 ± 1.3 6.6 ± 1.2 1.7 (0.77–2.56) <0.05
LVEF (%) 57.9 ± 4.3 63.7 ± 3.7 5.8 (3.19–8.41) <0.05
WMSI 0.02 ± 0.04 0.00 ± 0.00 0.02 (−0.04–−0.01 0.054
T2 weighted oedema (presence, n) 0 NA NA
CE (presence, n) 3 0

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or frequencies and percentages

CI confidence interval, LVEDD left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, EDV end-diastolic volume, BSA body surface area, LVESD left ventricular end-systolic diameter, ESV end-systolic volume, IVS interventricular septum, EDWM end-diastolic wall mass, SV stroke volume, SVI stroke volume index, CO cardiac output, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, WMSI wall motion score index, CE contrast enhancement, NA not applicable