Table 4.

Mean performance and effect size (${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$) for each measure of holistic processing for each subsample analyzed in Experiment 2.

Measure	Sample	Mean 1	Mean 2	${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$	p
VHPT-F		Congruent	Incongruent
	Male	71.80	50.61	0.81	<0.001
	Female	72.88	52.86	0.81	<0.001
	≤45 years	71.06	52.12	0.79	<0.001
Congruency effect		Congruent	Incongruent
	Male	2.17	1.60	0.49	<0.001
	Female	2.28	1.63	0.63	<0.001
	≤45 years	2.25	1.59	0.62	<0.001
Alignment effect		Misaligned	Aligned
	Male	73.16	79.47	0.19	0.002∗
	Female	73.76	79.23	0.10	0.010∗
	≤45 years	72.95	78.30	0.10	0.002∗

Means show accuracy (%) for the VHPT-F and Alignment Effect, and d’ for the Congruency Effect. Note that for each measure holistic processing is indexed by higher performance in the Mean 1 vs. Mean 2 condition. ^∗significant but in the opposite direction than theoretically predicted.