Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;7:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00189

Table 1.

Description of sociodemographic and clinical samples: median split by positive psychotic symptoms.

Psychotic patients with Less positive symptoms (10 FEP and 11 forensic) More positive symptoms (18 FEP and 3 forensic) p
Positive psychotic symptomsa 6 ± 1 14 ± 1 <0.0001
Age 31.57 ± 7.69 29.33 ± 7.80 0.355
MWT 107.65 ± 13.76 106.11 ± 14.29 0.748
CPZ 162,973.29 ± 163,944.46 60,926 ± 131,687.29 0.032
GAF 54.76 ± 16.55 49.10 ± 13.57 0.239
SAT: behavioral data
Mean reaction time (ms) 262.10 ± 46.44 260.73 ± 52.42 0.929
Total omissions 0.57 ± 1.36 2.48 ± 6.57 0.201
Premature responses 5.86 ± 8.77 4.33 ± 4.29 0.479
Implicit aberrant salience (ms) 15.79 ± 10.76 15.10 ± 8.52 0.819
Explicit aberrant salience (VAS%) 12.08 ± 11.46 10.89 ± 8.31 0.702

Data are presented as mean ± SD.

aSum of BPRS items (suspiciousness, hallucinations, unusual thought content, and conceptual disorganization).

CPZ, cumulative chlorpromazine equivalents during the previous year; GAF, global assessment of functioning; MWT, intelligence quotient test (Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenz-Test); SAT, Salience Attribution Test.