Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;16:419. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1122-0

Table 3.

Scores on measures per class and significant differences between the classes (N = 263)

Whole sample N = 263 Class 1 n = 118 (45%) Class 2 n = 116 (44%) Class 3 n = 29 (11%) Eta square p
Included in the LCA
 SFS (N = 263) 111.05 (24.1) 120.4 (21.0)a 105.51 (23.9)b 95.14 (22.1)b 0.14 <.001
 MHRM (N = 262) 3.48 (0.52) 3.85 (0.39)a 3.21 (0.37)b 3.03 (0.53)b 0.42 <.001
 BSI (N = 257) 0.76 (0.62) 0.32 (0.2)a 0.87 (0.32)b 2.1 (0.53)c 0.76 <.001
Included in post-hoc analysis
 MANSA 4.02 (0.69) 4.43 (0.52)a 3.74 (0.58)b 3.44 (0.74)c 0.31 <.001
 CANSAS Unmet needs 4.16 (3.03) 2.81 ((2.21)a 4.85 (2.97)b 7.07 (3.37)c 0.22 <.001
 CANSAS Met needs 8.12 (3.19) 8.44 (3.02) 7.88 (3.03) 7.71 (4.31) - ns
 CANSAS No needs 14.55 (3.36) 15.56 (3.56)a 14.09 (2.81)b 12.14 (2.90)c 0.11 <.001

Classes with different characters (a, b, c) significantly differ on the indicated variable. p < .05; classes with similar characters do not differ from each other

Interpretation Eta squared: .02 = small; .13 = medium; .26 = large