Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 22;17:957. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3304-z

Table 3.

Assessment of the yield and the fruit quality at the harvest carried out on 11th October 2011

mean weight harvested by stock (g) cluster mean weight (g) berry mean weight (g) sugar content (g/L) Acidity pH
Control untreated 496,7 ± 164,6 a 133,3 ± 38,0 a 1,46 ± 0,03 b 175,8 ± 0,7 a 4,2 ± 0,04 a 3,3 ± 0,04 a
BTH treated 1480,0 ± 296,1 b 193,6 ± 21,4 a 0,97 ± 0,03 a 180,9 ± 2,2 a 4,0 ± 0,13 a 3,4 ± 0,13 a
FOS treated 1794,2 ± 262,9 b 336,5 ± 33,1 b 1,47 ± 0,01 b 174,9 ± 0,2 a 4,2 ± 0,02 a 3,2 ± 0,02 a

Values with the same letter are not statistically different at a threshold of 0.05%