Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Jul 12;49(11):1027–1031. doi: 10.1002/eat.22579

Table 2. Effect Sizes (Cohen's d) for Pairwise Comparisons of Means of Impulsivity Dimensions Adjusted for Age.

Negative Urgency Lack of Premeditation Lack of Perseverance Sensation Seeking
Controls vs. Fully recovered -.10 -.03 .11 .01
Controls vs. Partially recovered -.88 -.12 -.04 .26
Controls vs. Active ED -1.10 -.10 -.41 .59
Fully recovered vs. Partially recovered -.78 -.10 -.15 .25
Fully recovered vs. Active ED -1.00 -.07 -.51 .58
Partially recovered vs. Active ED -.22 .02 -.37 .34

Note. ED = Eating Disorder. Effect sizes were computed using the ANCOVA model means (marginal means after adjusting for the covariate of age) and the square root of the mean squared error. Cohen's d effect sizes may be interpreted where .2 is small, .5 is medium, and .8 is large.27 Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons that were significant in the ANCOVAs are in bold.