Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Methods. 2016 May 23;22(3):486–506. doi: 10.1037/met0000075

Table 3.

Predicted probabilities from the loading invariance model for youth reported familism obligations

Indicator Response category (degree of agreement)
Not at all/a little Somewhat Very much Completely
Time 1
 V1T1 0.021 0.048 0.235 0.695
 V2T1 0.020 0.059 0.349 0.571
 V3T1 0.029 0.073 0.275 0.623
 V4T1 0.041 0.029 0.207 0.722
 V5T1 0.035 0.062 0.272 0.632
Time 2
 V1T2 0.031 0.101 0.301 0.567
 V2T2 0.010 0.104 0.407 0.479
 V3T2 0.025 0.105 0.370 0.499
 V4T2 0.007 0.056 0.247 0.690
 V5T2 0.018 0.120 0.370 0.492
Time 3
 V1T3 0.030 0.120 0.395 0.455
 V2T3 0.005 0.137 0.392 0.467
 V3T3 0.022 0.147 0.403 0.429
 V4T3 0.003 0.063 0.301 0.633
 V5T3 0.006 0.135 0.490 0.368
Time 4
 V1T4 0.033 0.188 0.345 0.434
 V2T4 0.012 0.147 0.408 0.434
 V3T4 0.035 0.163 0.390 0.412
 V4T4 0.003 0.058 0.335 0.604
 V5T4 0.030 0.163 0.395 0.412

Note. The calculation of these probabilities are based on ordered-categorical CFA output from Mplus using DWLS estimation with robust correction.

Indicators. V1: “Children should be taught that it is their duty to care for their parents when their parents get old.” V2: “If a relative is having a hard time financially, one should help him or her out if possible.” V3: “A person should share his or her home with relatives if they need a place to stay.” V4: “Older kids should take care of and be role models for their younger brothers and sisters.’ V5: “Parents should be willing to make great sacrifices to make sure their children have a better life.” Source: Knight et al. (2010).