Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Methods. 2016 May 23;22(3):486–506. doi: 10.1037/met0000075

Table 4.

Predicted probabilities from the threshold invariance model for youth reported familism obligations

Indicator Response category (degree of agreement)
Not at all/a little Somewhat Very much Completely
Time 1
 V1T1 0.015 0.068 0.248 0.669
 V2T1 0.016 0.083 0.256 0.645
 V3T1 0.028 0.084 0.246 0.642
 V4T1 0.030 0.062 0.188 0.720
 V5T1 0.023 0.095 0.287 0.595
Time 2
 V1T2 0.029 0.109 0.320 0.542
 V2T2 0.010 0.103 0.382 0.505
 V3T2 0.023 0.113 0.362 0.503
 V4T2 0.008 0.048 0.261 0.683
 V5T2 0.021 0.118 0.375 0.486
Time 3
 V1T3 0.033 0.129 0.355 0.483
 V2T3 0.011 0.129 0.440 0.419
 V3T3 0.027 0.139 0.414 0.420
 V4T3 0.011 0.063 0.303 0.623
 V5T3 0.035 0.149 0.381 0.435
Time 4
 V1T4 0.053 0.145 0.333 0.469
 V2T4 0.011 0.136 0.460 0.393
 V3T4 0.035 0.154 0.410 0.401
 V4T4 0.008 0.058 0.321 0.613
 V5T4 0.032 0.152 0.399 0.418

Note. The calculation of these probabilities are based on ordered-categorical CFA output from Mplus using DWLS estimation with robust correction.

Indicators. V1: “Children should be taught that it is their duty to care for their parents when their parents get old.” V2: “If a relative is having a hard time financially, one should help him or her out if possible.” V3: “A person should share his or her home with relatives if they need a place to stay.” V4: “Older kids should take care of and be role models for their younger brothers and sisters.” V5: “Parents should be willing to make great sacrifices to make sure their children have a better life.” Source: Knight et al. (2010).