Table 1.
Traitsa) | Mean | Mean ± S.D | ANOVAf) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hwaseong | O. rufipogon | Diff.b) | 96 linesc) | 83 linesd) | 13 linese) | Year (Y) | Genotype (G) | Y × G | ||
Days to heading | 108 | 109 | ns | 105 ± 6b g) | 107 ± 3b | 94 ± 4a | ||||
Rice quality | HR (%) | 85 | 26 | ** | 82.7 ± 13.4b | 85.7 ± 10.2b | 63.8 ± 15.9a | 22.1** | 325.2** | 3.3** |
CR (%) | 6.2 | 34.7 | ** | 10.0 ± 11.7a | 7.9 ± 8.7a | 23.4 ± 17.8b | 31.1** | 664.2** | 4.8** | |
PC (%) | 6.0 | 7.2 | ** | 6.3 ± 0.6a | 6.2 ± 0.5a | 7.1 ± 0.6b | 5.9** | 32.1** | 4.1** | |
AC (%) | 18.8 | 25.3 | ** | 18.5 ± 0.7b | 18.6 ± 0.5b | 17.5 ± 0.7a | 6.3** | 229.1** | 1.9** | |
G C R | 69.2 | 44.8 | ** | 68 ± 7b | 69 ± 5b | 59 ± 10a | 7.5** | 152.1** | 1.6** | |
Starch viscosity | PST (°C) | 75.4 | 79.3 | ** | 77.4 ± 5.4a | 76.9 ± 5.5a | 80.2 ± 3.6b | 1.7** | 186.2** | 1.1ns |
PKV (RVU) | 244.5 | 177.9 | ** | 234.4 ± 34.9a | 230.9 ± 29.3a | 255.9 ± 55.3b | 6.9** | 765.1** | 1.1 ns | |
HPV (RVU) | 133.9 | 131.1 | ns | 138.5 ± 19.6 | 137.5 ± 18.4 | 145.0 ± 25.4 | 10.0** | 755.2** | 1.0 ns | |
BDV (RVU) | 88.6 | 57.8 | ** | 95.7 ± 22.8a | 93.4 ± 19.5a | 110.9 ± 34.8b | 3.9** | 1013.0** | 0.7 ns | |
CPV (RVU) | 236.3 | 185.8 | ** | 243.7 ± 30.1a | 242.7 ± 28.9a | 250.6 ± 36.5a | 5.2** | 11.0** | 0.6 ns | |
SBV (RVU) | −18.22 | 7.9 | ** | 9.5 ± 22.1b | 11.7 ± 17.9b | −5.4 ± 36.9a | 4.1** | 97.1** | 0.6 ns | |
CSV (RVU) | 102.4 | 54.7 | ** | 105.0 ± 14.5a | 105.0 ± 13.8a | 104.6 ± 18.4a | 2.8** | 1208.0** | 0.6 ns |
a) HR Head rice ratio, CR Chalky rice ratio, PC Protein content, AC Amylose content, GCR Glossiness of cooked rice, PST pasting temperature, PKV peak viscosity, HPV hot paste viscosity, BDV breakdown viscosity, CPV cool paste viscosity, SBV setback viscosity, CSV consistency viscosity. b) Difference between Hwaseong and O. rufipogon. ns, *, and **indicate not significant, significant at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. c) all the lines, d) 86 introgression possessing no O. rufipogon segments on the region of qDTH6, e) 13 introgression lines possessing the O. rufipogon segment on the region of qDTH6. f) ANOVA with 96 lines over 7 years. ns, *, and **indicate not significant, significant at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. g) Numbers followed by the same letter in each row are not significantly different based on Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05