Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 24;6:253. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00253

Table 1.

Clinicopathological features in the prospective cohort, in all patients (first column) or stratified according to “Low” and “High” biomarker score in the urine or plasma.

Factors All
Stratified upon plasma score
Stratified upon urine score
N = 31 Low (N = 15) High (N = 15) Low (N = 14) High (N = 15)
Age 65 (58–77) 67 (61–80) 63 (56–74) 65 (56–74) 65 (58–77)
Gender
Female 9 7 2 6 3
Male 22 8 13 8 12
BMI 23.6 (22.5–26.7) 23.2 (23.1–24.5) 26.1 (22.3–28.1) 23.0 (20.3–23.9) 26.1 (23.3–28.0)
Smoking habits
Never smoker 18 9 8 8 9
Ex-smoker 8 1 7 1 6
Presence of metastasis
Yes 23 7 15 6 15
No 8 8 0 8 0
Tumor stage
T1/T1a/T1b 9 7 2 7 2
T2/T2a 10 5 5 3 6
T3> 9 2 6 3 5
N0 16 9 7 8 8
N1 1 0 1 0 1
NX 14 6 6 6 6
Fuhrman tumor grade
Grade 2 14 7 6 5 9
Grade 3 9 4 5 3 5
Grade 4 4 2 2 4 0
ECOG performance status
0 18 10 8 10 7
1 13 5 7 4 8
Heng classification
Good 15 10 5 8 6
Intermediate 15 4 10 5 9
Neutrophile-to-lymphocite
<3 24 10 13 10 13
≥3 5 3 2 2 2
Biomarker score 0.25 (0.14–0.67) 1.37 (1.10–1.74) 0.75 (0.54–1.10) 1.49 (1.24–1.87)

Distributions are summarized as median and interquartile ranges in brackets.