Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 6;44(1):8–16. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3498-y

Table 2.

Comparison of 30 % CT-based and 30 % PET-based response assessment performed after 3 weeks with the RECIST response assessment of week 6

RECIST RECIST Total
Responder Non-responder
CT diameter decrease >30 % 9 (15 %) 2 (3 %) 11 (18 %)
CT diameter decrease <30 % 17 (28 %) 32 (54 %) 49 (82 %)
26 (43 %) 34 (57 %) 60 (100 %)
Sensitivity = 35 % Specificity = 94 %
SUVpeak decrease >30 % 23 (38 %) 21 (35 %) 44 (73 %)
SUVpeak decrease <30 % 3 (5 %) 13 (22 %) 16 (27 %)
26 (43 %) 34 (57 %) 60 (100 %)
Sensitivity = 88 % Specificity = 38 %

SUV standardized uptake value, RECIST response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure