Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 3;1:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2012.06.002

Table 2.

Prediction of functional effect of missense variants in FGFR1 using the Align-GVGD program.

Variant A-GVDV
GV GD Prediction class
P23L 73.35 97.78 Class C15
P25L 102.71 56.87 Class C0
P28L 0.00 97.78 Class C65
G48S 0.00 55.27 Class C55
R54H 0.00 28.82 Class C25
D59V 0.00 152.22 Class C65
G70R 0.00 125.13 Class C65
A74V 65.28 0.00 Class C0
V88L 0.00 30.92 Class C25
A94E 0.00 106.71 Class C65
V102I 0.00 28.68 Class C25
S107L 144.08 0.00 Class C0
S125L 0.00 144.08 Class C65
D128A 0.00 125.75 Class C65
A167S 0.00 99.13 Class C65
W213G 0.00 183.79 Class C65
G237S 0.00 55.27 Class C55
V248M 0.00 20.52 Class C15
R250Q 0.00 42.81 Class C35
P252T 0.00 37.56 Class C35
P252R 0.00 102.71 Class C65
L261F 0.00 21.82 Class C15
I300T 0.00 89.28 Class C65
N330I 0.00 148.91 Class C65
L342S 0.00 144.08 Class C65
P366L 0.00 97.78 Class C65
Y374C 0.00 193.72 Class C65
C381R 0.00 179.53 Class C65
R424H 0.00 28.82 Class C25
R470L 0.00 101.88 Class C65
V513G 0.00 189.55 Class C65
V607M 0.00 12.52 Class C15
P722S 0.00 193.35 Class C65
Q764H 0.00 24.08 Class C15
L767R 0.00 101.88 Class C65
L769V 0.00 30.92 Class C25
P772S 0.00 73.35 Class C65
R822C 0.00 179.53 Class C65
A-GVGD graded classifiers, ordered from most likely to interfere with function to least likely:
  • GD >= 65 + tan(10) × (GV^2.5) = > Class C65 < = > most likely.
  • GD >= 55 + tan(10) × (GV^2.0) = > Class C55.
  • GD >= 35 + tan(50) × (GV^1.1) = > Class C35.
  • GD >= 25 + tan(55) × (GV^0.95) = > Class C25.
  • GD >= 15 + tan(75) × (GV^0.6) = > Class C15.
  • Else (GD < 15 + tan(75) × (GV^0.6)) = > Class C0 < = > less likely.