Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 11;5(10):e003815. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003815

Table 6.

Adjusted Regression Models Assessing Extent of CAC Burden in Participants With CAC >0 by Quintiles of Total Calcium Intake at the MESA Baseline Exam

Calcium Intake Quintile Difference in Agatston Unitsa 95% CI Limits P Value
Model 1b
Q1: <434.9 0 Reference
Q2: 434.9–650.7 −15.45 −76.5 to 45.6 0.62
Q3: 650.7–936.5 −19.69 −80.7 to 41.3 0.53
Q4: 936.5–1453.5 −31.78 −94.3 to 30.7 0.32
Q5: ≥1453.5 −7.84 −71.4 to 55.7 0.81
Model 2c
Q1: <434.9 0 Reference
Q2: 434.9–650.7 −31.95 −95.2 to 31.3 0.32
Q3: 650.7–936.5 −45.16 −113.7 to 23.4 0.20
Q4: 936.5–1453.5 −59.33 −133.3 to 14.6 0.12
Q5: ≥1453.5 −51.00 −133.6 to 31.6 0.23

BMI indicates body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAC, coronary artery calcium; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; MESA, the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

a

Log transformed.

b

Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, site, BMI, exercise, smoking, pack‐years, alcohol, education, income, health insurance, and total caloric intake.

c

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 variables+systolic BP, diastolic BP, family history of heart disease, total cholesterol, HDL‐cholesterol, lipid‐lowering medication use, diabetes mellitus, eGFR, total homocysteine, current aspirin use, and calcium supplement use.