Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 29;5(10):e004211. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004211

Table 2.

Follow‐Up Community Cohort Outcomes by Sex

Outcome During Follow‐Up Entire Cohort (n=416) Men (n=288) Women (n=128) P Value
AVR, n (%) 133 (32) 103 (36) 30 (23) 0.01
Severe AS, n (%)a 84 (20) 59 (21) 25 (20) 0.89
84/133 (63) 59/103 (57) 25/30 (83) 0.009
Severe AR, n (%)a 38 (9) 34 (12) 4 (3) 0.003
38/133 (28) 34/103 (33) 4/30 (13) 0.04
Aortic dissection, n (%) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.7) 0 (0) 0.52
Aorta diameter, mmb 39±7 (n=336) 40±7 (n=239) 37±6 (n=97) 0.0002
Aneurysm formation, n (%)c 49 (13) (n=384) 38 (15) (n=259) 11 (9) (n=125) 0.14
Aorta surgery, n (%)d 49 (12) 37 (13) 12 (9) 0.4
Endocarditis, n (%) 9 (2) 9 (4) 0 (0) 0.06
Total events, n % 161 (39) 123 (43) 38 (30) 0.01

AR indicates aortic regurgitation; AS, aortic stenosis; AVR, aortic valve replacement; BAV, bicuspid aortic valve.

a

Total (first row) and as cause for aortic valve replacement (second row).

b

There were 336 follow‐up echocardiograms (81%) with aortic diameter measurements in 416 patients.

c

After excluding 32 patients with aneurysms at baseline, the remaining 384 (men 259, women 125) patients remained at risk for aneurysm formation at follow‐up.

d

Surgery for aneurysm, coarctation, or dissection.