Table 3.
Haplotype | Total insight problem solving | Spatial insight problem solving | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequencies (%) | B | t | R2 | pemp1 | pemp2 | B | t | R2 | pemp1 | pemp2 | ||
Block 1a | ACCT | 39.2 | 0.022 | 0.091 | 0.000 | 0.755 | 1.00 | 0.002 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.976 | 1.00 |
ACTC | 31.3 | 0.115 | 2.48 | 0.006 | 0.115 | 0.614 | 0.094 | 1.65 | 0.004 | 0.206 | 0.820 | |
GCTC | 17.9 | −0.024 | 0.075 | 0.000 | 0.781 | 1.00 | 0.048 | 0.303 | 0.001 | 0.576 | 0.999 | |
ADTC | 9.9 | −0.231 | 4.45 | 0.010 | 0.038 | 0.257 | −0.258 | 5.54 | 0.013 | 0.020 | 0.147 | |
Rare haplotypes | 1.7 | |||||||||||
Global test | 0.118 | 0.217 | 0.114 | 0.213 | ||||||||
Block 2b | CCGGCCGCGC | 41.8 | −0.071 | 1.04 | 0.002 | 0.306 | 0.937 | −0.054 | 0.598 | 0.001 | 0.453 | 0.989 |
TTGTACAGTT | 32.1 | 0.133 | 3.54 | 0.008 | 0.059 | 0.388 | 0.146 | 4.30 | 0.010 | 0.039 | 0.275 | |
CTGTACAGTT | 8.5 | 0.183 | 2.46 | 0.006 | 0.117 | 0.617 | 0.196 | 2.80 | 0.007 | 0.092 | 0.543 | |
CTGGCCGCGC | 6.6 | −0.286 | 4.17 | 0.010 | 0.043 | 0.293 | −0.242 | 2.97 | 0.007 | 0.085 | 0.506 | |
CTAGCTAGGC | 5.4 | −0.127 | 0.681 | 0.002 | 0.407 | 0.983 | −0.182 | 1.41 | 0.003 | 0.239 | 0.875 | |
Rare haplotypes | 5.7 | |||||||||||
Global test | 0.034 | 0.064 | 0.025 | 0.047 |
Haplotype frequencies were estimated using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm in Plink and linear regression was used to estimate haplotype-specific effect. An omnibus test was employed to obtain a global p value for the haplotype block. Empirical point-wise p-values (pemp1) and multiple testing corrected p-values (pemp2) were obtained by 10,000 permutations. Rare haplotypes (estimated frequency <5%) were excluded from the analysis.
The order of SNPs in block 1 was rs1799732, rs4938019, rs4648317, and rs4245418.
The order of SNPs in block 2 was rs4436578, rs7122246, rs2283265, rs1076560, rs6277, rs6276, rs6279, rs6278 and rs1800497. The significance p-values (<0.05) are indicated in bold.