Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 1;10(10):ZC84–ZC88. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20892.8665

[Table/Fig-10]:

Comparison of test discs with respect to colonies of C. albicans per field on smooth and rough surfaces.

Materials Smooth Surface* Rough Surface*
Mean± SD Median Mean± SD Median
Molloplast B 11.20±1.82 11.00 12.80±3.01 13.50
Permaflex 8.70±1.99 9.00 14.80±2.05 13.50
GC Soft Liner 3.50±1.22 3.50 12.30±3.23 11.00
Ufi Gel Hard C 9.40±3.31 9.00 14.00±3.30 13.50
H-value 11.9846 2.4384
p-value 0.0074 S 0.4865 NS
Pair wise comparison of test discs†
Molloplast B vs. Permaflex p=0.0758 p=0.3472
Molloplast B vs. GC Soft Liner p=0.0090* p=0.6761
Molloplast B vs.Ufi Gel Hard C p=0.3472 p=0.5309
Permaflex vs. GC Soft Liner p=0.0122* p=0.1172
Permaflex vs. Ufi Gel Hard C p=0.6761 p=0.9168
Ufi Gel Hard C vs. GC Soft Liner p=0.0163* p=0.4034

* Kruskal Wallis ANOVA, † Mann-Whitney U test, S-significant, NS-not significant