Skip to main content
. 2016 May 13;7(25):38052–38063. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9343

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of HEY2 expression and outcomes of HCC patients in training cohort (n=351).

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age (≤ 47 vs. > 47 years) 0.796 (0.642-0.988) 0.138
Gender (female vs. male) 0.846 (0.593-1.207) 0.357
HBsAg (positive vs. negative) 1.175 (0.870-1.587) 0.294
Tumor size (≤ 5 vs. > 5 cm) 1.374 (1.069-1.765) 0.013 1.316 (1.007-1.719) 0.045
Tumor multiplicity (single vs. multiple) 1.215 (0.974-1.517) 0.085
Tumor capsule 0.648 (0.521-0.807) 0.000 0.706 (0.558-0.895) 0.004
Liver cirrhosis (yes vs. no) 0.698 (0.514-0.950) 0.022 0.765 (0.558-1.048) 0.095
AFP (≤ 20 vs. > 20 ng/mL) 1.388 (1.086-1.773) 0.009 1.159 (0.899-1.495) 0.254
LNM (Yes vs. no) 1.816 (1.213-2.717) 0.004 1.588 (1.042-2.420) 0.032
Tumor differentiation 1.431 (1.202-1.704) 0.000 1.266 (1.055-1.521) 0.011
TNM (I vs. II vs. III vs. IV) 1.237 (1.123-1.362) 0.000 1.081 (0.967-1.209) 0.172
Vascular invasion (Yes vs. No) 1.808 (1.393-2.346) 0.000 1.215 (0.911-1.621) 0.185
HEY2 expression (low vs. high) 1.753 (1.401-2.193) 0.000 1.645 (1.309-2.067) 0.000

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confident interval; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; LNM, lymph node metastasis.