Skip to main content
. 2016 May 26;7(25):38750–38761. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9606

Table 1. Associations between Paf15 IOD scores and clinicopathological features in RC IHC samples (n = 105).

Prognostic variables No. of cases Paf15-H in RC(%) P-value (χ2/multi) Paf15-H in AT§(%) P-value (χ2/multi)
Gender 0.498/0.945 0.118/0.388
male 56 30 (53.57) 8(14.29)
female 49 23 (46.94) 13(26.53)
Age 0.494/0.170 0.435/0.978
≥65 52 28 (53.85) 12(23.08)
<65 53 25 (47.17) 9(16.98)
Histological grade 0.193/0.788 0.114/0.050
G1-G2 26 10(38.46) 8(30.77)
G3-G4 79 42(53.16) 13(16.46)
Infiltration degree 0.242/0.231 0.272/0.184
T1-T2 21 13(61.90) 6(28.57)
T3-T4 84 40(47.62) 15(17.86)
Lymph node metastasis 0.0001*/0.337 0.373/0.999
+ 44 11(25.00) 7(15.91)
- 61 42(68.85) 14(22.95)
pTNM Stage 0.0001*/0.0001* 0.279/0.999
I-II 46 12(26.09) 14(23.73)
III-IV 59 41(69.49) 7(15.22)
Tumor size 0.944/0.004* 0.918/0.777
<15cm3 36 18(50.00) 7(19.44)
≥15cm3 69 35(50.72) 14(20.29)
*

Correlation significant at the 0.01 level (two tailed); pTNM, pathological tumor/node/metastasis; multi, multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Number of Paf15 high expression (IOD > median) cases and the percentage in RC tissues.

§

Number of Paf15 high expression (IOD > median) cases and the percentage in matched adjacent non-cancerous rectal tissues.