Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 7;58(1):165–173. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.165

Table 2. Overall and Subgroup Analyses and Heterogeneity of SP110 Gene Polymorphisms with the Risk of TB.

Variables n Allelic models Homozygote comparisons Heterozygote comparisons Dominant models Recessive models
OR (95% CI)* I2 (%) p value OR (95% CI)* I2 (%) p value OR (95% CI)* I2 (%) p value OR (95% CI)* I2 (%) p value OR (95% CI)* I2 (%) p value
rs9061 A vs. G AA vs. GG AG vs. GG AA+AG vs. GG AA vs. AG+GG
 Overall 7 (5) 1.28 (1.14, 1.44) 0 <10−4 2.84 (1.84, 4.38) 33 <10−5 1.23 (1.05, 1.43) 13 0.009 1.32 (1.14, 1.53) 0 <10−3 2.26 (1.18, 4.34) 71 0.01
 All in HWE 6 (4) 1.31 (1.15, 1.49) 0 <10−4 2.32 (1.46, 3.69) 0 <10−3 1.34 (1.11, 1.60) 0 0.002 1.42 (1.19, 1.69) 0 <10−4 1.47 (1.11, 1.95) 44 0.008
 High quality 5 (5) 1.31 (1.17, 1.48) 0 <10−5 2.84 (1.84, 4.38) 33 <10−5 1.23 (1.05, 1.43) 13 0.009 1.32 (1.14, 1.53) 0 <10−3 2.26 (1.18, 4.34) 71 0.01
 Sample size
  >500 4 (4) 1.31 (1.16, 1.48) 0 <10−4 2.93 (1.81, 4.73) 49 <10−4 1.25 (1.06, 1.46) 22 0.006 1.33 (1.14, 1.55) 0 <10−3 2.28 (1.04, 4.98) 77 0.04
  <500 3 (1) 1.13 (0.82, 1.55) 0 0.46 2.45 (0.88, 6.82) NA 0.09 0.94 (0.50, 1.77) NA 0.85 1.19 (0.67, 2.11) NA 0.55 2.49 (0.91, 6.83) NA 0.08
rs1135791 C vs. T CC vs. TT CT vs. TT CC+CT vs. TT CC vs. CT+TT
 Overall 10 (7) 0.99 (0.84, 1.18) 70 0.95 0.76 (0.57, 1.02) 29 0.07 0.95 (0.75, 1.21) 71 0.69 0.94 (0.74, 1.19) 73 0.61 0.80 (0.64, 1.07) 28 0.13
 All in HWE 9 (6) 1.04 (0.87, 1.24) 67 0.68 0.75 (0.55, 1.02) 40 0.07 1.02 (0.81, 1.30) 64 0.84 1.01 (0.79, 1.30) 69 0.94 0.78 (0.58, 1.06) 38 0.11
 High quality 8 (6) 1.01 (0.82, 1.25) 7 0.92 0.71 (0.49, 1.02) 37 0.06 0.96 (0.72, 1.28) 75 0.78 0.95 (0.71, 1.27) 77 0.72 0.76 (0.53, 1.09) 38 0.14
 Ethnicity
  Asian 9 (6) 1.01 (0.82, 1.23) 74 0.94 0.71 (0.49, 1.02) 37 0.06 0.96 (0.72, 1.28) 75 0.78 0.95 (0.71, 1.27) 77 0.72 0.76 (0.53, 1.09) 38 0.14
 Sample size
  >500 7 (5) 0.91 (0.77, 1.09) 71 0.31 0.73 (0.47, 1.14) 51 0.17 0.81 (0.71, 0.92) 29 0.001 0.80 (0.70, 0.90) 34 <10−3 0.76 (0.52, 1.09) 50 0.13
  <500 3 (2) 1.46 (1.07, 1.98) 0 0.02 1.12 (0.16, 8.04) 0 0.91 1.80 (1.23, 2.63) 0 0.003 1.80 (1.23, 2.63) 0 0.003 0.88 (0.56, 1.41) 0 0.60
rs11556887 T vs. C TT vs. CC TC vs. CC TT+TC vs. CC TT vs. TC+CC
 Overall 8 (4) 1.10 (0.90, 1.34) 70 0.35 1.32 (0.93, 1.85) 6 0.12 1.26 (0.85, 1.87) 81 0.26 1.32 (0.88, 2.00) 83 0.18 1.23 (1.02, 1.48) 0 0.03
 High quality 6 (4) 1.16 (0.94, 1.44) 75 0.17 1.32 (0.93, 1.85) 6 0.12 1.26 (0.85, 1.87) 81 0.26 1.32 (0.88, 2.00) 83 0.18 1.23 (1.02, 1.48) 0 0.03
 Ethnicity
  Asian 6 (2) 1.11 (0.83, 1.50) 66 0.47 2.76 (0.97, 7.89) 0 0.06 1.56 (1.20, 2.02) 0 <10−3 1.61 (1.25, 2.07) 0 <10−3 2.59 (0.91, 7.39) 0 0.07

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TB, tuberculosis; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; SP110, Speckled 110.

I2, value of I2 for heterogeneity test; p value, p value of the Z test for overall effect.

*A random-effect model was used when I2 >50%; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used, Figure before the bracket is the number of studies for allele model; figure in the bracket is the number of studies for other four model.