Table 5.
Significant statistical effects of age (Younger Y vs. Older O) and gender on intra- and inter-network FC measures, following FC analysis using 1node definitions defined from the younger, independent cohort, and 2nodes defined separately for the older adults.
| F | P | η2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-network FC (group) | ||||
| Main effect: Age1 | Y > O | 10.606 | 0.002 | 0.218 |
| Intra-network FC (male) | ||||
| Main effect: age1 | Y > O | 8.18 | 0.01 | 0.312 |
| ACC inter-network FC (group) | ||||
| Interaction: age∗network1 | 4.48 | 0.026 | 0.106 | |
| Interaction: age∗network2 | 7.33 | 0.004 | 0.16 | |
| ACC-DAN (O > Y) | <0.001 | 0.46 | ||
| ACC-DMN (Y > O) | 0.006 | 0.18 | ||
| ACC inter-network FC (male) | ||||
| Interaction: age∗network1 | 4.55 | 0.028 | 0.202 | |
| ACC-DAN (O > Y) | 0.047 | 0.20 | ||
| Interaction: age∗network2 | 4.76 | 0.024 | 0.21 | |
| ACC-DAN (O > Y) | 0.008 | 0.33 | ||
| ACC inter-network FC (female) | ||||
| Interaction: age∗network2 | 4.17 | 0.042 | 0.19 | |
| ACC-DAN (O > Y) | <0.001 | 0.60 | ||
| ACC-DMN (Y > O) | 0.03 | 0.24 |
Pairwise comparisons within each ANOVA were Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons.