Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 30;291(48):25106–25119. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.753491

TABLE 1.

Experimental and calculated binding affinity for computationally designed point mutants of C225

Mutation KDa ΔΔGexpb ΔΔGcalcc ΔΔEpaird ΔΔEHbnde EHbnd_scf ΔΔGAbg
nm kcal/mol kcal/mol
WT C225 1.52 ± 0.29 0 0 0 0 0 0
C225-L NQh −0.7 −0.4 −0.4 −1.1 1.6
C225-M 15.26 1.36 −0.7 0.1 −0.8 −1.1 6.3
C225-H1 0.77 ± 0.09 −0.41 −2.0 −1.1 −1.2 −2.2 −0.7
C225-H2 1.09 ± 0.13 −0.20 −0.2 −0.1 −0.7 −1.1 3.1
C225-H3 0.37 ± 0.04 −0.84 −0.9 −0.6 −0.2 −0.2 0.4
C225-H 0.08 ± 0.03 −1.75 −3.2 −6.3
F06 5.5
CS06 0.13
B10 24.3
B10v5 0.19

a The KD (nm) for wild type (WT) C225 and mutant mAbs was determined by SPR as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Where n > 1, the S.D. is given. KD values (nm) for c-MET interaction with bivalent anti-c-MET mAbs were determined by BLI. CS06 is the affinity-matured variant of F06, and B10v5 is the derivative of B10.

b Experimental binding affinity relative to wild type (kcal/mol).

c Predicted binding affinity relative to wild type using Rosetta.

d Predicted change in Rosetta pair energy across the interface.

e Predicted change in hydrogen bond energy across the interface.

f Calculated hydrogen bond energy of mutated residue side chain.

g Predicted change in folding energy of the isolated antibody.

h Not quantifiable; very weak binding.