TABLE 1.
Mutation | KDa | ΔΔGexpb | ΔΔGcalcc | ΔΔEpaird | ΔΔEHbnde | EHbnd_scf | ΔΔGAbg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nm | kcal/mol | kcal/mol | |||||
WT C225 | 1.52 ± 0.29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
C225-L | NQh | −0.7 | −0.4 | −0.4 | −1.1 | 1.6 | |
C225-M | 15.26 | 1.36 | −0.7 | 0.1 | −0.8 | −1.1 | 6.3 |
C225-H1 | 0.77 ± 0.09 | −0.41 | −2.0 | −1.1 | −1.2 | −2.2 | −0.7 |
C225-H2 | 1.09 ± 0.13 | −0.20 | −0.2 | −0.1 | −0.7 | −1.1 | 3.1 |
C225-H3 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | −0.84 | −0.9 | −0.6 | −0.2 | −0.2 | 0.4 |
C225-H | 0.08 ± 0.03 | −1.75 | −3.2 | −6.3 | |||
F06 | 5.5 | ||||||
CS06 | 0.13 | ||||||
B10 | 24.3 | ||||||
B10v5 | 0.19 |
a The KD (nm) for wild type (WT) C225 and mutant mAbs was determined by SPR as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Where n > 1, the S.D. is given. KD values (nm) for c-MET interaction with bivalent anti-c-MET mAbs were determined by BLI. CS06 is the affinity-matured variant of F06, and B10v5 is the derivative of B10.
b Experimental binding affinity relative to wild type (kcal/mol).
c Predicted binding affinity relative to wild type using Rosetta.
d Predicted change in Rosetta pair energy across the interface.
e Predicted change in hydrogen bond energy across the interface.
f Calculated hydrogen bond energy of mutated residue side chain.
g Predicted change in folding energy of the isolated antibody.
h Not quantifiable; very weak binding.