Skip to main content
. 2004 Aug 3;5:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-5-20

Table 2.

Power and ELods from 100 replicates of simulated data, dominant susceptibility allele frequency of 0.01

PENETRANCE IN DD:Dd SUSC. ALLELE CARRIERS PENETRANCE IN dd NORMAL HOMOZYGOTE % FAMILIES LINKED

100% 75% 50% 25%
Power1 ELod ± s.d.2 Power1 ELod ± s.d.2 Power1 ELod ± s.d.2 Power1 ELod ± s.d.2
0.8 0.08 100 14.0 ± 0.3 99 8.9 ± 0.3 82 4.7 ± 0.2 18 1.7 ± 0.1
0.8 0.15 100 14.7 ± 0.3 100 9.1 ± 0.3 73 4.8 ± 0.2 14 1.6 ± 0.1
0.7 0.08 100 14.8 ± 0.3 99 8.5 ± 0.3 77 4.8 ± 0.2 17 1.8 ± 0.15
0.7 0.15 100 15.2 ± 0.3 99 8.8 ± 0.3 70 4.5 ± 0.2 14 1.6 ± 0.1
0.6 0.08 100 15.0 ± 0.3 98 8.6 ± 0.25 67 4.3 ± 0.2 14 1.7 ± 0.1
0.6 0.15 100 14.2 ± 0.3 100 8.4 ± 0.3 73 4.3 ± 0.2 5 1.2 ± 0.1

1Power = 100 X Proportion of replicate samples that yielded a homogeneity LOD score ≥ 3.0 2ELod = average homogeneity LOD score over all replicates ± its standard deviation