Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 22;38(4):205–212. doi: 10.3109/01658107.2014.894535

TABLE 1.

Means and standard deviations and statistical comparison for different ethnicity and gender groups for optic nerve parameters.

  Asian
Caucasian
     
  Male (n = 32)
Female (n = 35)
Male (n = 32)
Female (n = 34)
p Value
Parameter Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Gender Ethnicity Different pattern between males and females in two ethnicities
Age 32.19 15.25 31.49 14.92 33.53 13.75 33.59 14.92 0.90 0.50 0.88
Disc area (mm2) 1.58 0.33 1.80 0.32 1.63 0.26 1.53 0.30 0.21 0.13 0.009
Cup area (mm2) 0.60 0.34 0.71 0.41 0.45 0.32 0.51 0.31 0.066 0.001 0.81
Rim area (mm2) 0.98 0.25 1.06 0.35 1.13 0.33 1.00 0.29 0.59 0.33 0.049
Cup volume (mm3) 0.12 0.09 0.17 0.16 0.08 0.07 0.11 0.12 0.086 0.001 0.98
Rim volume (mm3) 0.14 0.07 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.002 0.17 0.36
Cup disc ratio 0.37 0.16 0.40 0.20 0.28 0.16 0.31 0.16 0.29 0.008 0.68
Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (µm)
 Mean 118.0 14.41 115.0 16.45 117.0 13.83 119.8 12.30 0.83 0.58 0.19
 Temporal 74.2 13.37 73.1 13.36 68.9 10.24 70.1 13.90 0.98 0.07 0.59
 Superior 135.2 19.75 132.0 23.57 131.2 15.97 135.8 14.97 0.80 0.96 0.23
 Nasal 95.4 21.47 92.8 21.41 99.0 19.58 97.3 20.42 0.56 0.29 0.91
 Inferior 135.1 15.93 133.4 19.74 134.8 17.17 137.21 18.25 0.92 0.56 0.50

Rim volume was significantly larger in males, whereas cup volume and area and cup/disc ratio was significantly larger in Indians. The interaction term (gender × ethnicity) indicates a different pattern between males and females in the two ethnic groups and was statistically significant for disc and rim areas.