Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Mar 22;15(2):241–268. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9169-x

Table 1.

Marginal Utility of a Drink

VARIABLES Drinker-driver Groupsa
Total
0
1–4
5+
0 vs. 5+
0 vs. 1–4
1–4 vs. 5
Means Means Means Means t-test t-test t-test
Drinking benefit indexb 24.57 22.43 28.29 29.00 4.39** 8.12** −0.48
    Drink to forget troubles 2.81 2.48 3.34 3.78 −3.52** −4.8** −1.13
    Drink to get a buzz 4.08 3.51 5.00 5.61 −5.33** −7.68** −1.56
    Drink to socialize more easily 4.39 3.84 5.41 5.05 −3.28** −8.58** 0.92
    Drink because I like the taste 5.78 5.63 6.07 5.84 −0.55 −2.35* 0.62
    Drink to relax 5.68 5.30 6.35 6.34 −2.76** −5.76** 0.01
    It would be inappropriate not to
drink
1.88 1.72 2.13 2.38 −2.09* −2.65** −0.69
Importance of drinking for social lifec 0.24 0.17 0.35 0.52 −6.95** −6.77** −2.61**
    Not important 0.30 0.37 0.18 0.16 3.52** 6.54** 0.51
    Slightly important 0.46 0.46 0.47 0.33 2.02* −0.42 2.14*
    Quite important 0.16 0.13 0.21 0.33 −4.46** −3.39** −2.18*
    Very important 0.08 0.04 0.14 0.19 −5.19** −6.11** −0.98

N 1168 748 356 64
**

Significant at the 1 percent level

*

Significant at the 5 percent level

a

Respondents are grouped according to the number of drunk driving episodes they reported having in the previous year. The column “total” contains all respondents, the column “0” contains those repsondents who reported 0 drunk driving episodes for the past year, etc.

b

Drinking benefit index components take values from 0 to 10, where 0 is “not at all important” and 10 is “extremely important.”

c

The variable “importance of drinking for social life” is a binary variable equal to 1 if drinking was “very important” or “quite important” to social life and equal to 0 otherwise.