Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 21;9:7177–7185. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S113307

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors in relation to recurrence-free survival using the Cox proportional hazards model (n=120)

Variables RFS
HR (95% CI) P-values
Univariate analysis
 Age (≤60 vs >60) 1.066 (0.615–1.847) 0.820
 Smoking (no vs yes) 0.783 (0.421–1.458) 0.441
 Drinking (no vs yes) 0.929 (0.536–1.611) 0.793
 Tumor subsite (supraglottic/glottic/subglottic) 0.712 (0.214–2.375)
0.597 (0.180–1.982)
0.640
 T stage (T1 + T2 vs T3 + T4) 1.127 (0.650–1.955) 0.670
 N stage (N0 vs N1–N3) 1.117 (0.624–1.999) 0.710
 TNM stages (I + II vs III + IV)a 1.240 (0.679–2.265) 0.485
 Pathological type (highly/moderately/poorly) 0.656 (0.232–1.853)
0.743 (0.313–1.765)
0.721
 NLR (low vs high) 1.921 (1.107–3.335) 0.020
 PLR (low vs high) 2.698 (1.475–4.938) 0.001
 TILs density (low vs high) 0.456 (0.260–0.802) 0.006
Multivariate analysis
 PLR (low vs high) 2.622 (1.431–4.804) 0.002
 TILs density (low vs high) 0.473 (0.269–0.832) 0.009

Note:

a

According to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.

Abbreviations: NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; TILs, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; RFS, recurrence-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.