Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 16;22:4386–4392. doi: 10.12659/MSM.897620

Table 1.

Comparison of ovarian reserve markers in different socioeconomic groups.

LSES (31) Mean ± standart deviation MSES (37) Mean ± standart deviation HSES (33) Mean ± standart deviation P value
Age (years) 28.40±5.27 28.40±5.27 28.14±4.84 β: 0.180
α: 0.108
μ: 0.835
Weight (kg) 65.77±12.56 62.08±10.31 63.18±4.84 β: 0.188
α: 0.367
μ: 0.656
Height (cm) 1.62±0.049 1.61±0.056 1.64±0.076 β: 0.478
α: 0.261
μ: 0.086
FSH (IU/L) 13.56±9.70 4.59±2.35 4.66±2.75 β: 0.000
α: 0.000
μ: 0.906
AMH (ng/ml) 0.92±1.02 2.92±1.00 3.16±0.70 β: 0.000
α: 0.000
μ: 0.257
AFC (mm) 5.03±2.84 12.45±4.38 11.57±3.60 β: 0.000
α: 0.000
μ: 0.364

Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. LSES – low socioeconomic status; MSES – middle socioeconomic status; HSES – high socioeconomic status, AMH – anti-Müllerian hormone; FSH – follicle stimulating hormone; AFC – Antral follicle count. Comparison between LSES(3) and MSES(2) – β; Comparison between LSES(3) and HSES(1) – α; Comparison between MSES(2) and HSES(1) – μ.