Abstract
BACKGROUND
Expanding evidence indicates that apolipoprotein B (apo B) is superior to LDL cholesterol as a marker of vascular disease. Although traditional lipid measures are known to predict type 2 diabetes, limited data are available regarding apo B. We assessed the association of apo B with incident type 2 diabetes and compared it with traditional lipid variables as a risk predictor in aboriginal Canadians.
METHODS
Of an initial cohort of 606 individuals without diabetes in 1993–1995, 540 were contacted for the 10-year follow-up evaluation in 2003–2005. Fasting and 2-h postload glucose concentrations were obtained at baseline and follow-up to determine incident type 2 diabetes. Baseline fasting serum lipids were measured with standard laboratory procedures.
RESULTS
The cumulative 10-year incidence of type 2 diabetes was 17.5%. High concentrations of apo B, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol, and low concentrations of HDL cholesterol were individually associated with incident type 2 diabetes in univariate analyses. Comparing C statistics of univariate models showed apo B to be a superior determinant of incident diabetes compared with LDL (P = 0.026) or HDL (P = 0.004) cholesterol. With multivariate adjustment including waist circumference, apo B (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.11–2.02) and triglycerides (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.12–1.98) remained associated with incident diabetes, whereas LDL and HDL cholesterol became nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS
The association of plasma apo B with incident type 2 diabetes and its better prediction of risk compared with LDL or HDL cholesterol suggest the potential for the use of apo B in type 2 diabetes risk communication and prevention.
The association between plasma apolipoprotein B (apo B)11 concentration and the development of vascular disease is well established (1–4). Expanding evidence further indicates that apo B is a superior marker of vascular disease compared with conventional plasma lipid indices, including LDL cholesterol (1, 4).
Although conventional lipid measures are associated with incident type 2 diabetes (5, 6), limited data are available regarding apo B. One report demonstrated that apo B was associated with incident type 2 diabetes among Turkish women (7). We assessed whether apo B was associated with incident type 2 diabetes and was a better risk predictor than traditional lipid variables in an aboriginal community undergoing rapid cultural transition and with high prevalences of obesity and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (8).
The Sandy Lake Health and Diabetes Project is a cohort study designed to determine factors associated with incident diabetes among aboriginal Canadians. Baseline data were obtained from 728 residents of Sandy Lake First Nation (age range, 10–79 years) in 1993–1995 (8). Among 606 residents free of diabetes at baseline, 540 (89.1%) participated in the 10-year follow-up evaluation in 2003–2005 (5). Those who did not return for follow-up (n =66) were slightly younger than respondents but were not different with respect to sex ratio and body mass index (5). After we excluded participants who died during follow-up (n = 27), had missing baseline fasting and 2-h postload glucose data, or had diabetes at baseline as defined by the revised WHO diagnostic criteria (5), 492 men and women remained in the present study. The Sandy Lake First Nation Band Council and the University of Toronto Ethics Review Committee approved the study, and signed informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Baseline blood samples were collected into tubes containing EDTA after the participants had fasted overnight for 8–12 h, and the tubes were refrigerated immediately after collection (8). Samples were centrifuged, and the plasma was removed within 20 min of the blood draw and then frozen at −70 °C before shipment on dry ice to St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada, for analysis. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was administered, with a postload glucose sample drawn at 120 min. Glucose concentration was measured with the glucose oxidase method, and the lipid profile was evaluated with the standard methods described in the Lipid Research Clinics manual of operations, with LDL cholesterol calculated with the Friedewald formula (9). Anthropometric measures at baseline have been described previously (5). Height and weight were measured with an Accustat wall-mounted stadiometer (Genentech) and a hospital balance-beam scale (Health-o-Meter/Pelstar), respectively. Waist circumference was measured at the iliac crest with an inelastic tape.
Incident type 2 diabetes was defined as the presence of any one of the following at follow-up: (a) fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L or 2-h postload glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L on a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test; (b) current use of insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents; or (c) a positive response to the question, “Have you ever been diagnosed with diabetes by a nurse or doctor?” (5).
Distributions of continuous variables were assessed for normality, and natural logarithm transformations of skewed variables were used in descriptive statistical analyses when appropriate. Baseline characteristics of participants with and without incident diabetes were compared with the Welch modified t-test or the χ2 test, as appropriate. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate associations of lipid measures with incident diabetes. The odds ratio (OR) per 1-SD increase in the corresponding lipid variable and the 95% CI were calculated. Sex interactions with lipid variables were assessed by adding an interaction term to a model adjusted for age, sex, and hypertension, in addition to the main effect. In addition, the interaction of LDL cholesterol with apo B was evaluated. To compare the ability of different logistic models to discriminate between participants with and without incident diabetes, we calculated C statistics, which are analogous to the area under the ROC curve, and used the DeLong algorithm to determine the statistical significance (10).
Of 492 participants, 86 (17.5%) had developed type 2 diabetes at follow-up: 72 of 383 participants (18.8%) were ascertained from the fasting and/or 2-h postload glucose data at follow-up, and 14 of 109 participants without follow-up blood samples (12.8%) were ascertained from the self-reported clinical diagnosis only. Participants without follow-up blood samples were younger (P =0.009) but were not different at baseline with respect to sex or body mass index (P ≥ 0.05 for both). Individuals who developed diabetes had higher values for plasma apo B concentration, body mass index, waist circumference, fasting glucose concentration, and 2-h postload glucose concentration and were more likely to have had hypertension at baseline (all P <0.001; Table 1). At baseline, apo B concentration correlated with HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations (r = −0.29, r = 0.93, and r = 0.69, respectively; all P < 0.001, Spearman correlation analysis).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the Sandy Lake Health and Diabetes Project participants according to the presence or absence of incident diabetes at the 10-year follow-up.a
Characteristic | No diabetes | Incident diabetes | P |
---|---|---|---|
Participants, n | 406 (82.5%) | 86 (17.5%) | |
Age, years | 25.4 (13.0) | 31.5 (12.4) | <0.001 |
Male/female sex, nb | 173/233 (42.6%/57.4%) | 34/52 (39.5%/60.5%) | 0.60 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 25.4 (5.5) | 29.4 (5.3) | <0.001 |
Waist circumference, cm | 94.4 (14.1) | 104.7 (12.1) | <0.001 |
Hypertension, yes, nb,c | 54 (13.3%) | 29 (33.7%) | <0.001 |
Apo B, g/L | 0.99 (0.27) | 1.15 (0.26) | <0.001 |
Apo A-1, g/L | 1.48 (0.22) | 1.49 (0.26) | 0.67 |
Apo B/apo A-1 ratio | 0.68 (0.21) | 0.80 (0.25) | <0.001 |
Apo B/HDL cholesterol ratio | 0.83 (0.32) | 1.03 (0.40) | <0.001 |
HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.26 (0.28) | 1.19 (0.25) | 0.02 |
LDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.42 (0.74) | 2.74 (0.66) | <0.001 |
Triglycerides, mmol/Ld | 1.10 (0.81–1.53) | 1.48 (1.16–1.82) | <0.001 |
Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.25 (0.88) | 4.68 (0.75) | <0.001 |
Fasting glucose, mmol/L | 5.3 (0.46) | 5.6 (0.58) | <0.001 |
2-h Postload glucose, mmol/L | 5.4 (1.62) | 6.5 (2.08) | <0.001 |
Except where indicated, data are presented as the mean (SD) with the Welch t-test performed.
χ2 Test.
Hypertension is defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg, a diastolic pressure of ≥85 mmHg, or receiving antihypertensive medication therapy.
Data are presented as the median (25th–75th percentiles); Welch t-tests were performed on ln-transformed data.
In univariate analyses, increased baseline apo B, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations, and low baseline HDL cholesterol concentrations were individually associated with incident diabetes (Table 2). Comparing C statistics of univariate regression models (Table 2) revealed apo B to be a superior discriminator of participants with and without diabetes, compared with either LDL or HDL cholesterol (P = 0.026 and 0.004, respectively), whereas C statistics for triglycerides and apo B were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Although there was no significant interaction between apo B and LDL cholesterol (P = 0.23), apo B concentration was significantly associated with incident diabetes among those in the lowest tertile of LDL cholesterol (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.09–3.56; P = 0.02), whereas LDL cholesterol was not significantly associated with this outcome among those in the lowest apo B tertile (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.70–3.18; P = 0.30). Associations of apo B with diabetes in the second and third tertiles of LDL cholesterol were not statistically significant, nor were associations of LDL cholesterol with diabetes in the second and third tertiles of apo B (see Table 1 in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this Brief Communication at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol56/issue4). This observation suggests that apo B may be particularly useful when the LDL concentration is low, although this observation requires confirmation in future studies, given that our statistical power was limited for these tertile-based analyses.
Table 2.
Logistic regression analysis of the associations of lipids with incident type 2 diabetes.
SDa | C statistica | OR (95% CI)e | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | Model 4d | |||
LDL cholesterol | 0.739 | 0.652 | 1.50 (1.18–1.90) | 1.30 (0.99–1.69) | 1.24 (0.93–1.63) | 1.25 (0.94–1.66) |
HDL cholesterol | 0.273 | 0.575 | 0.75 (0.58–0.97) | 0.72 (0.55–0.93) | 0.84 (0.64–1.11) | 0.84 (0.64–1.11) |
Triglyceridesf | 0.446 | 0.687 | 1.93 (1.52–2.46) | 1.79 (1.37–2.32) | 1.53 (1.16–2.03) | 1.49 (1.12–1.98) |
Apo B | 0.272 | 0.689 | 1.79 (1.42–2.27) | 1.67 (1.26–2.20) | 1.50 (1.12–2.01) | 1.50 (1.11–2.02) |
Unadjusted.
Adjusted for sex, age, and hypertension, with hypertension defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg, a diastolic pressure of ≥85 mmHg, or receiving antihypertensive medication therapy.
Adjusted for model 2 variables and waist circumference.
Adjusted for model 3 variables and fasting plasma glucose.
OR (95% CI) per 1-SD change.
ln-Transformed triglyceride data used.
With multivariate adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, waist circumference, and fasting plasma glucose, LDL and HDL cholesterol concentrations were not significantly associated with incident diabetes, whereas high apo B and triglyceride concentrations remained significantly associated (Table 2). With the same adjustment, the ratio of apo B to apo A-I and the ratio of apo B to HDL cholesterol were associated with incident diabetes, but to a slightly lower degree of risk than for apo B alone [ORs, 1.41 (95% CI, 1.07–1.84) and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.09–1.85), respectively]. There were no statistically significant sex interactions with individual lipid measures with respect to diabetes incidence (all interaction P values >0.05; data not shown).
In the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study, increased apo B and triglyceride concentrations were associated with men, who had a higher prevalence of central obesity than women in this study population, and with IGT (11). Central obesity has been associated with insulin resistance, which leads to a defect in the ability of insulin to suppress free fatty acids (12), and this defect in insulin action has been associated with increased apo B and triglyceride concentrations (11, 13). This evidence is relevant to the current study population, aboriginal Canadians, who have high prevalences of central obesity, insulin resistance, and IGT (5, 8). In addition, increased free fatty acids have been shown to decrease the uptake of glucose by peripheral tissues, to reduce hepatic insulin clearance, and to promote hepatic gluconeogenesis (14–16). Hence, the compromised ability of insulin to suppress free fatty acids in the presence of central obesity may contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes, and this pathophysiological pathway may be marked by increased triglyceride and apo B concentrations.
Limitations of our study include the challenges of conducting investigations in the setting of a remote community. Specifically, we were unable to collect interim data to analyze the time to the onset of diabetes. We were also unable to obtain follow-up blood samples from all participants. Diabetes outcome assessments of 109 (22.2%) participants were by self-reported clinical diagnosis only. This percentage of the participants without blood samples might have caused underreporting of incident type 2 diabetes. In addition, the current findings from a study population with a young mean age and a high prevalence of central obesity might not be generalizable to all populations.
In summary, a high plasma apo B concentration was associated with incident type 2 diabetes and was superior to LDL and HDL cholesterol in predicting the disease in this aboriginal population with high prevalences of obesity and IGT (8). With additional confirmation from future studies, apo B could be incorporated into communicating increased risk for diabetes, in addition to the progression of atherosclerotic disease, especially among high-risk populations.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to the leadership and community members of Sandy Lake First Nation for their enthusiastic partnership and participation in this project.
Footnotes
parts of this study were presented in abstract form at the 11th Symposium of the International Diabetes Epidemiology Group, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, October 15–18, 2009;
Nonstandard abbreviations: apo B, apolipoprotein B; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; OR, odds ratio.
Author Contributions: All authors confirmed they have contributed to the intellectual content of this paper and have met the following 3 requirements: (a) significant contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting or revising the article for intellectual content; and (c) final approval of the published article.
- Employment or Leadership: None declared.
- Consultant or Advisory Role: None declared.
- Stock Ownership: None declared.
- Honoraria: None declared.
- Research Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). S.H. Ley, CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship; S.B. Harris, the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) Chair in Diabetes Management and the Ian McWhinney Chair in Family Medicine at the University of Western Ontario; R.A. Hegele, the Edith Schulich Vinet Canada Research Chair (Tier I) in Human Genetics, the Martha Blackburn Chair in Cardiovascular Genetics, and the Jacob J. Wolfe Distinguished Medical Research Chair at the University of Western Ontario; B. Zinman, the Sam and Judy Pencer Family Chair in Diabetes Research at Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto; A.J. Hanley, CIHR Canada Research Chair in the Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes and Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation Early Researcher Award.
- Expert Testimony: None declared.
Role of Sponsor: The funding organizations played no role in the design of study, choice of enrolled patients, review and interpretation of data, or preparation or approval of manuscript.
References
- 1.Walldius G, Jungner I, Holme I, Aastveit AH, Kolar W, Steiner E. High apolipoprotein B, low apolipoprotein A-I, and improvement in the prediction of fatal myocardial infarction (AMORIS study): a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358:2026–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07098-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jiang R, Schulze MB, Li T, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, et al. Non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B predict cardiovascular disease events among men with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1991–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.8.1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lamarche B, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Cantin B, Bernard P-M, Dagenais GR, et al. Apolipoprotein A-I and B levels and the risk of ischemic heart disease during a five-year follow-up of men in the Québec cardiovascular study. Circulation. 1996;94:273–8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barter PJ, Ballantyne CM, Carmena R, Castro Cabezas M, Chapman MJ, Couture P, et al. Apo B versus cholesterol in estimating cardiovascular risk and in guiding therapy: report of the thirty-person/ten-country panel. J Intern Med. 2006;259:247–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ley SH, Harris SB, Mamakeesick M, Noon T, Fiddler E, Gittelsohn J, et al. Metabolic syndrome and its components as predictors of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in an Aboriginal community. CMAJ. 2009;180:617–24. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wilson PWF, Meigs JB, Sullivan L, Fox CS, Nathan DM, D’Agostino RB., Sr Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1068–74. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.10.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Onat A, Can G, Hergenc G, Yazici M, Karabulut A, Albayrak S. Serum apolipoprotein B predicts dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome and, in women, hypertension and diabetes, independent of markers of central obesity and inflammation. Int J Obes. 2007;31:1119–25. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Harris S, Gittelsohn J, Hanley A, Barnie A, Wolever TM, Gao J, et al. The prevalence of NIDDM and associated risk factors in native Canadians. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:185–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lipid research clinics program: manual of laboratory operations. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 1984. p. 81. NIH publ. no. 75-6282. [Google Scholar]
- 10.DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Laws A, Hoen HM, Selby JV, Saad MF, Haffner SM, Howard BV for the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS) Investigators. Differences in insulin suppression of free fatty acid levels by gender and glucose tolerance status. Relation to plasma triglyceride and apolipoprotein B concentrations. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:64–71. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.1.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jensen MD, Haymond MW, Rizza RA, Cryer PE, Miles JM. Influence of body fat distribution on free fatty acid metabolism in obesity. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:1168–73. doi: 10.1172/JCI113997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Julius U. Influence of plasma free fatty acids on lipoprotein synthesis and diabetic dyslipidemia. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2003;111:246–50. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sniderman AD, Scantlebury T, Cianflone K. Hypertriglyceridemic hyperapoB: the unappreciated atherogenic dyslipoproteinemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:447–59. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Svedberg J, Strömblad G, Wirthm A, Smith U, Björntorp P. Fatty acids in the portal vein of the rat regulate hepatic insulin clearance. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:2054–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI115534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ferrannini E, Barrett EJ, Bevilacqua S, DeFronzo RA. Effect of fatty acids on glucose production and utilization in man. J Clin Invest. 1983;72:1737–47. doi: 10.1172/JCI111133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.