Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Oral Microbiol. 2016 Jul 20;32(3):211–225. doi: 10.1111/omi.12165

Table 3.

Distribution of tissue samples positive for P. gingivalis, T. denticola, T. forsythia and F. nucleatum gDNA by PCR.

Group Infection Positive systemic tissue samples

Heart Aorta Liver Spleen Kidney Lung Brain
n = 11 n = 6 n = 11 n = 5 n = 11 n = 11 n = 11
TLR2−/− Pg/Td/Tf/Fn 8/4/5/1 5/1/3/0 1/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 9/2/0/11 4/3/0/4 0/0/0/0
Control 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0

n = 7 n = 7 n = 7 n = 7 n = 7 n = 7 n = 7
TLR4−/− Pg/Td/Tf/Fn 7/2/0/2 6/3/0/5 0/2/1/1 0/0/0/0 1/1/0/0 3/0/1/1 0/0/0/0
Control 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0 0/0/0/0

Pg – P. gingivalis, Td – T. denticola, Tf – T. forsythia, Fn – F. nucleatum. The first value corresponds to the number of mice that tested positive for P. gingivalis genomic DNA, the second value to the number of mice that tested positive for T. denticola genomic DNA, the third value to the number of mice that tested positive for T. forsythia genomic DNA and the fourth value to the number of mice that tested positive for F. nucleatum genomic DNA. None of the sham-infected (control) mice were tested positive for any of the bacterial genomic DNA.