Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 16;283(1842):20161671. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1671

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Capture probability versus the global measure of injury of the prey school and the number of attacks for different values of the injury growth constants aI, a (see electronic supplementary material, equations S1 and S2 for details) assuming ΔI = 1. The dashed lines indicate pmin and pmax. (b) Group hunting model: number of prey captured per individual as a function of N scaled by the number of prey captured for a solitary predator (horizontal dotted line). The largest group sizes, which offer an advantage to solitary hunting, are typically observed for short times T ≤ 1 h and decrease for longer times (or small prey schools). (c) Theoretical prediction on number of fish captured per predator versus predator group size for varying hunting times T. Again, nc is normalized by the number of prey captured by a solitary predator. Solid line shows the contour corresponding to the value of nc = 1 (same as solitary hunter) and represents therefore the border of the region where group hunting is beneficial. Default model parameters in all panels if not varied or otherwise stated: τa = 2.6 s, τa = 20 s, a = 5 × 10−4, pmin = 0, pmax = 1, S0 = 200.